Pontiac GTO Forum Pontiac GTO
Sponsors

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Go Back   Pontiac GTO Forum > The 2004-2006 GTO > 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2007, 09:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
06pontiacgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 48
My Photos: (0)
goat vs pony vs s2000

If these cars had a race what would the outcome be because i was think about buying a honda s2000 to drive around in stead of getting all these miles on my gto.
I am not saying i am gettin rid of my gto im not i am keeping that but i am looking into buying a honda s2000 also anyone know how fast they are (horsepower) and is this a good idea?
06pontiacgto is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-10-2007, 10:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
6QTS11OZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Where the women are scarce and the sheep are scared.
Posts: 1,739
My Photos: (16)
If driven equally in a straight line race the GTO will win. In the twisties the S2000 will win.
__________________
~I'm ya huckleberry~
516/500 2-da-rears.

http://media.putfile.com/GTO-Maggie-dyno-run
6QTS11OZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 10:16 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
04YJ-GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 405
My Photos: (0)
Honda 2000 has 240hp stock, pretty quick for a little 4 cyclinder, I drove one around for a couple days that we had on the lot, handles nice

Last edited by 04YJ-GTO : 11-10-2007 at 12:23 PM.
04YJ-GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 10:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Tacmedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 238
My Photos: (0)
The S2000....

...and the GTO are like night and day. The S2000 is a HP motor with most of the power in the upper ranges of the RPM, while the GTO relies more on the torque. I like them both for what they are. I'd like to have an s2000 for trackdays
Tacmedic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 04:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Wing_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coastal CT
Posts: 1,196
My Photos: (1)
As already noted, the GTO and S2000 are completely different. The GTO is quiet, comfortable, and has gobs of torque. The S2000 is noisy, rides like a buckboard, and needs to be run above 6,000 rpm to extract any performance. But....for short periods of time it is way more fun than a GTO.

I had an 05 M6 GTO. My friend has an S2000. The lack of torque is a bit frustrating but the handling, steering, braking all make up for it. I would say the S2000 is by far the most all round fun to drive.

Now that my commute consists of a short ride to a train station, I'm actually looking for an S2000 myself. As a weekend car and short drives in the real world where you can't use the power of a GTO or Vette, the S2000 is just way more fun. I'm on small New England roads all the time and the size of the Honda can make a big difference in negotiating tight roads.

I'm breaking my normal rule of buying new and looking for a used one. These things depreciate as fast or faster than a GTO. People buy them without understanding just how uncompromising and hard edged the S2000 is. Then, in less than a year, they trade them in for something more comfortable. You can find a 2006 with under 10K miles for $25K. Since I'm only going to beat the snot out of it on weekends, I'd rather pocket the extra 10 grand.

Good luck.

Oh yeah, to answer your original question, in simple straight line the GTO & Mustang win. On a road course the S2000 would eat Goat and Horse meat for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

Last edited by Wing_Nut : 11-10-2007 at 04:43 PM.
Wing_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 10:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
LOWET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: HOME
Posts: 631
My Photos: (5)
GTO, PONY & s2000

Compairing these 3 cars is about impossible. you can go back and forth forever about the GTO VS Mustang, but throw the s2000 into the mix is a waiste of typing space . The Honda is a decent car but can't be compaired to the othere 2 in anyway except that they both have 4 wheels and a motor. The Mustang and GTO will eat up the 2000 anywhere, on the street, on a track or even a road course. Just think back a few years when DRIFTING became popular, nothing more then putting a car on a road course and getting it to slideways hard and deep in the corners. The GTO came out on top and was king of the hill. The 2000 is ok in the corners but not enough HP to power their way out of them. The GTO and the Mustang can enter and exit the corners at a much higher rate of speed and when those corners start to straighten out just a little THEY ARE GONE and out of site of the little 2000
LOWET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 11:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Wing_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coastal CT
Posts: 1,196
My Photos: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWET View Post
Compairing these 3 cars is about impossible. you can go back and forth forever about the GTO VS Mustang, but throw the s2000 into the mix is a waiste of typing space . The Honda is a decent car but can't be compaired to the othere 2 in anyway except that they both have 4 wheels and a motor. The Mustang and GTO will eat up the 2000 anywhere, on the street, on a track or even a road course. Just think back a few years when DRIFTING became popular, nothing more then putting a car on a road course and getting it to slideways hard and deep in the corners. The GTO came out on top and was king of the hill. The 2000 is ok in the corners but not enough HP to power their way out of them. The GTO and the Mustang can enter and exit the corners at a much higher rate of speed and when those corners start to straighten out just a little THEY ARE GONE and out of site of the little 2000
Have you ever actually driven a GTO and S2000 back to back? On a track? IMHO you are clueless about what makes a car fast. Yes the S2000 has much less torque and power than a GTO but it also weighs less by about 900 Lbs with a chunk of that coming from unsprung weight (tires, wheels, suspension components). Still, the power to weight ratio comes out in favor of the GTO.

However, power is the brute force (i.e. neanderthal) method of going fast. There are other ways. Honda has employed a racing mentality in the design of the S2000. The light weight does a lot more than improve power to weight ratios. Combined with a rigid chassis and stiff suspension the car has better grip, reduced inertia, faster reaction to road imperfections (that unsprung weight), and far less understeer. The S2000 can carry more speed deeper into a corner, brake later, and be on the gas earlier when exiting......smooooth!
Buh bye Mr. Goat and Pony!

What that means, is that the S2000 doesn't need to accelerate as hard as a GTO coming out of a corner because it doesn't lose all the speed it carried into the corner. While a GTO driver is stabbing the brakes and fighting the front tires to maintain control, the S2000 will sail by with a 5 mph speed differential. After the corner, the GTO will need all of it's power advantage to get back up to the S2000's speed. Ever tried to race someone rolling up beside you with a 5-10 mph speed advantage? You need a pretty large power advantage to overcome the speed deficit! And, the S2000 driver will likely never miss a shift because the Honda transmission is one of the best ever made as opposed to the T56 in the GTO that couldn't catch a 3-2 downshift in less than 2 seconds to save your life.....literally.

Quote:
The GTO and the Mustang can enter and exit the corners at a much higher rate of speed and when those corners start to straighten out just a little THEY ARE GONE and out of site of the little 2000
Yes they can, only they'll be sideways and THEY ARE GONE off the track somewhere near the apex with the front tires howling in protest until the rear end breaks loose. You continue to provide entertainment, thanks.

Perhaps if you actually drove the cars before offering an opinion. Standing on the gas pedal on the highway doesn't count.

Last edited by Wing_Nut : 11-11-2007 at 01:50 PM.
Wing_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 03:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Wing_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coastal CT
Posts: 1,196
My Photos: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWET View Post
Just think back a few years when DRIFTING became popular, nothing more then putting a car on a road course and getting it to slideways hard and deep in the corners. The GTO came out on top and was king of the hill.
Uh....drifting is fun but it has little to do with lapping a track quickly. It's more about subjective style and impressing the high school crowd than objective measures like lap speed. But, OK the GTO is a way better drift car than an S2000.
Wing_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 06:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
fergyflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eustis Fl.
Posts: 2,615
My Photos: (0)
I'm going to agree with Wing Nut, but only with an asterisk. It would depend on the track. There are some tracks that a high powered, looser handling car is going to have an advantage over a scalpel like the S2000. Most tracks though would favor the S2000's better handling.
fergyflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 07:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Wing_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coastal CT
Posts: 1,196
My Photos: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fergyflyer View Post
I'm going to agree with Wing Nut, but only with an asterisk. It would depend on the track. There are some tracks that a high powered, looser handling car is going to have an advantage over a scalpel like the S2000. Most tracks though would favor the S2000's better handling.
Granted. A track with long straights and wide sweeping turns would favor power over finesse. And I know that at some point (i.e. Z06) finesse ain't gonna be enough to overcome a massive power advantage. But cars like the Exige and S2000 are completely valid designs.....just different. And when we're talking competition like a stock GTO or Mustang vs a stock S2000, c'mon.

I tend to get pissed when someone who doesn't know what they're talking about comes out with these these generalized off the wall statements based solely on something like engine size or horsepower.

The GTO is a great value and a pleasure to drive but let's face it, the car was never intended to be a race car.....drag, road course, or otherwise.
It was a Musclecar (aka Grand Tourer). In that role, it has no equal at the price.

Last edited by Wing_Nut : 11-11-2007 at 07:35 PM.
Wing_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 2004-2006 GTO > 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.