Pontiac GTO Forum Pontiac GTO
Sponsors

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Go Back   Pontiac GTO Forum > GTO Forum Discussion > In the News
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2008, 01:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 67
My Photos: (0)
News FORD is bleeding off Premier brands...

First Aston Martin, now Jag and Land Rover. Sold to the Indians. India which was a British Colony has now come around to colonize British Mfg.

MarketWatch.com: Stock Market Quotes - Business News - Financial News

The Germans also bought some British Auto Mfg as well, I wonder how those are doing?

Some of my friends are betting that Ford will revert back to its roots of being a Truck & Farm Machinery Maker like International Harverster. What are yoour thoughts?

I love the free market and global economy, don't you?
patisi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-26-2008, 05:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
fergyflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eustis Fl.
Posts: 2,570
My Photos: (0)
Truck and farm machinery, I thought that's what the Mustang was, the fastest farm tractor on 4 wheels. LOL.

I heard about the Jag deal and Tata motors yeaterday. It doesn't suprise me. Ford has been bleeding for so long, that they desperately needed cash. I wouldn't be shocked if Volvo and maybe Mazda went soon too.

For the last 30 years, Ford has focused on moving production away from the US. During that same period, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Mercedes, BMW and Hyundai have all focused on bringing production stateside. Look at the financial situation of the 6 that have brought production here versus Ford that is funneling it away from here. Ford does a poor job negotiating with the UAW and then blame UAW workers for Ford managements stupidity. They knew when they gave the goose away that there wouldn't be any more golden eggs, but instead of holding their ground, well that's enough on that rant.

Then their product line-up is piss poor. The current Taurus is boring and not very attractive. The Fusion is decent, but aging with nothing in the wings to replace it. The Focus redesign was cosmetic only and the platform is almost 10 years old. It was barely competitive when it came out and now finishes last behind Suzuki's and such. The F150 redesign is decent, but the engines lack power to be competitive and don't offer a fuel economy savings for the lack of power. The Ranger is 375 years old and about as stiff a platform as a bowl of jello. The Explorer has gotten too big, the Escape Hybrid was a total design failure, you lose the A/C when the engine shuts down. The Edge is a decent design that for some reason isn't selling well. But that's it, a bunch of failures on new stuff and old stuff that's well past it's prime.

The 4.6L V8 that is the basis for their modular series of motors was designed to be a cost effective motor without regards for performance or fuel economy. Now it is an underperformer in both those catagories, but it sure is cheap to build. They don't have any cuttng edge powertrains and are suffering from that too.

I will not cry a tear when they leave the market, they have made their own bed. My mother had a Taurus that between 60 and 63,000 miles, just 500-3,000 miles out of waranty, and had the transmission, the master cylinder, the wheel cylinders, the power steering rack, the power steering pump, and the radiator fail. Ford's answer was the warranty period is the warranty period, sorry about your luck. No partial help, no nothing. Well every dollar I have spent on vehicles since their stance, and it's been a considerable amount, and every dollar my family has spent has been at something other than a Ford dealership. Their refusal to help a loyal Ford customer that got her car serviced at a Ford dealer regularly, caused them to lose more than a half million in business since 2000.

Sorry Ford, R.I.P.
fergyflyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 07:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
raspantienator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Johnstown, NY
Posts: 890
My Photos: (0)
Talkng about Ford, I need some clarification. My impression was our GTO's were GT eaters but should be careful of Modded Mustangs. Motor Trend Mag recently compared 3 Mustangs: Roush, Saleen and Shelby. None of them had over 320 horse power and their 0-60 and 1/4 mile times were slower than Stock GTO's typically run hense my confusion

Ford's future...Oye
__________________

Last edited by raspantienator : 03-26-2008 at 07:24 PM.
raspantienator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 07:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
fergyflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eustis Fl.
Posts: 2,570
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raspantienator View Post
Talkng about Ford, I need some clarification. My impression was our GTO's were GT eaters but should be careful of Modded Mustangs. Motor Trend Mag recently compared 3 Mustangs: Roush, Saleen and Shelby. None of them had over 320 horse power and their 0-60 and 1/4 mile times were slower than Stock GTO's typically run hense my confusion

Ford's future...Oye
Any stang with a supercharger is a threat. The Roush, Saleen and Shelby have Supercharged versions. If they tested cars with only 320 hp, they weren't the S/C versions.

Remember, there are 31 Flavors of Baskin and Robbins and Ford Mustangs. Some are pretty decent, others aren't worth letting your dog lick.
fergyflyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 12:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Wing_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coastal CT
Posts: 1,196
My Photos: (1)
Ford got into this mess the old fashioned way. They earned it!

Decades of sub-par quality, lackluster styling, and 2nd rate technology are coming home to roost. I'm an admitted Ford a hater but even if I try and be subjective for a moment, I honestly can't think of a single Ford product that I'd even consider plunking down my cash for. There are simply too many excellent alternatives in every niche. IMHO, Ford is 5 to 7 years behind current industry standards or, one to two generations of product.

As Fergy pointed out, Ford drivetrains are simply not competitive.....with anything. I had a 500/Taurus as a rental car a couple of years ago and could not believe how crude the 3.X V6 and CVT were. I simply couldn't fathom how they had started with a Volvo S80 and ended up with that POS. How could they possibly expect to sell that ugly underpowered pig against the simultaneously launched Chrysler/Charger twins?

As for Jag and Land Rover, Ford has no idea how to manage and nuture a premium brand. TaTa can do no worse. The idiots in Dearborn have absolutely wasted billions of dollars of shareholders wealth buying and propping up two marginal manufacturers who probably shouldn't exist (Darwinism). And Ford thought they knew how to make these troubled marques competitive because of their skillful handling of say....the Lincoln brand?

No thanks. I like what GM has done with Cadillac much better.

Last edited by Wing_Nut : 03-27-2008 at 12:55 AM.
Wing_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 04:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Aramz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 923
My Photos: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Aramz06
Sad thing is Ford purchased Jaguar in 1989 I believe for $2.5 billion. Then they purchased Land Rover in 2000 for $2.7 billion. Now they just sold both companies TOGETHER for 2.3 billion. Overall I believe Ford spend $3 billion+ on improving jar and land rover.
__________________
Flowmaster Super 44 Series Mufflers with 3" tips, Resonator delete.

Aramz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 04:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
raspantienator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Johnstown, NY
Posts: 890
My Photos: (0)
Thanks for the response Fergy. I won't think they are so special just because they have the name of Saleen for example.

That was a bad business venture with Rover and Jaguar. I still want For to remain becasue they are part of the whole picture. We need those Mustangs around.

What would the cheetah do without the gazelle?
__________________
raspantienator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 07:20 AM   #8 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Rukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,399
My Photos: (16)
Be forced to eat rabbits?!
Rukee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 07:40 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
ppurfield001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 222
My Photos: (12)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patisi View Post
First Aston Martin, now Jag and Land Rover. Sold to the Indians. India which was a British Colony has now come around to colonize British Mfg.

MarketWatch.com: Stock Market Quotes - Business News - Financial News

The Germans also bought some British Auto Mfg as well, I wonder how those are doing?

Some of my friends are betting that Ford will revert back to its roots of being a Truck & Farm Machinery Maker like International Harverster. What are yoour thoughts?

I love the free market and global economy, don't you?

Just remember that "Ford" has always meant Fix Or Repair Daily. Fergy's story is right on the mark. My local Pontiac dealer treated me very well when the ignition crapped out a few months after my extended warranty ended on my 1999 Grand Prix GTP. The dealer did the work for the cost of the parts. That's a brand I can support. I also agree that GM has done a good job with Cadillac. My 2005 SRX is a great daily driver. Of course, my '67 GTO is the most fun to drive..........
__________________
ppurfield001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 06:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
fergyflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eustis Fl.
Posts: 2,570
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rukee View Post
Be forced to eat rabbits?!
Man your going to piss Groucho off with that comment. Then we'll have to hear him tell us how the Rabbit is almost as fast as the GTO ... er Holden was. LOL
fergyflyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


  Pontiac GTO Forum > GTO Forum Discussion > In the News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford F-150 Owners BEWARE GTO JUDGE The Lounge 13 07-29-2007 08:45 PM
Ford reports its worst loss ever aintmisbehavinn 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 6 01-29-2007 09:52 PM
Shelby GT500 vs C6 Vette in CandD Good 2 go The Lounge 36 06-19-2006 12:13 PM
Double Take: 2005 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2005 Pontiac GTO 05GTO In the News 4 01-15-2005 08:04 AM
GM And Ford Concepts In Fast Company 05GTO In the News 0 11-27-2004 08:11 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.