Pontiac GTO Forum Pontiac GTO
Sponsors

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Go Back   Pontiac GTO Forum > GTO Forum Discussion > In the News
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2006, 01:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Hummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
My Photos: (0)
News GTO is gone for now

Gone for Now
Pontiac to drop GTO after '06 model year

By JAMIE LAREAU | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS

AutoWeek | Published 02/21/06, 1:04 pm et

DETROIT -- General Motors has told Pontiac dealers that it will discontinue the GTO coupe at the end of this model year. GM will make the last deliveries of the vehicle to dealers by the end of September, sources close to Pontiac say.

GM will produce 10,000 to 12,000 more GTOs before dropping the nameplate, one source close to the situation says. Last year, Pontiac sold 11,590 GTOs compared to 2004 when it sold 13,569. That's a 14.6 percent drop.

When Pontiac launched the GTO in 2003, it projected 18,000 annual sales. The vehicle was criticized for bland styling, and some fans of the original GTO complained that it lacked nostalgic styling cues.

A Pontiac spokesman confirms the GTO will be discontinued after the 2006 model year.

“There are some changes in the federal regulatory standards. One is an airbag deployment standard that would require some very expensive re-engineering of the car,” says Jim Hopson, Pontiac spokesman. “Since the architecture of this car is being phased out around the world it’s not economically feasible to continue this car.”

Pontiac will continue to build the GTO through the end of May, Hopson says. The last “boatload will hit the ground in June”, he adds.

The GTO first came to dealerships in December 2003 as a 2004 model, Hopson says.

The GTO is built on a rear-wheel drive architecture from GM's Holden division in Australia. The present model is going out of production as GM constructs the new Zeta RWD architecture, says the source.

There is no replacement coupe planned at this time and because of the strong Australian and weak U.S. dollar, the GTO had to be priced thousands over where GM originally wanted it -- in the mid-twenties, the source says. "It never did as much volume as we had hoped," the source says.

Pontiac is considering a replacement in the lineup for a RWD performance vehicle, but does not have anything to announce yet, Hopson says.

The GTO suggested retail price starts at $31,990, including shipping. One GM source says, "the 2005 and 2006 were pretty well sold out, and sales were especially strong in areas of GM weakness, like Southern California. It's a shame it has to go -- for now."
__________________
-Stuart
2005 GTO
Photos & Mods

Last edited by 05GTO : 02-21-2006 at 03:07 PM.
Hummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-21-2006, 02:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
DallasSleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Lonestar state
Posts: 210
My Photos: (0)
Read the last 2 words of the last sentence..... We are only getting a part of the story. I Honestly think the GTO will be back as the sister to the camaro.
__________________
2005 IBM, M12; 1 of 160 Bone Stock "For Now"
DallasSleeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
GOATGIRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: savannah, ga
Posts: 850
My Photos: (6)
I personally think they maybe making room for a come back of the Trans-Am...but I've been wrong before!
GOATGIRL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
DallasSleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Lonestar state
Posts: 210
My Photos: (0)
I would swear that I read somewhere a couple months ago that they came out and said the Trans am name was dead forever.
__________________
2005 IBM, M12; 1 of 160 Bone Stock "For Now"
DallasSleeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canton and Toledo Ohio
Posts: 29
My Photos: (0)
They won't bring back the GTO because no one is going to let them put a V6 into a GTO, which is what they would have to do to make it a viable business proposition. There is a video of I think Bob Lutz walking around the Camaro concept and he explains that to make it a profitable car they would have to sell over 100,000 a year, so a V6 would be starting around $20k with a V8 in the mid to low 30s. Thats about as straight from the horses mouth as it gets. The GTO of this generation was a product of luck. They happened to have a car already in production and they happened to have a hole in their market for a high performance car (no camaro or firebird). IF there is a Pontiac version of the new Camaro, which there probably will be because we know GM loves to rebadge, it will be a Firebird and it will come with a V6 with a V8 option in the mid 30s.
tkd0706 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 03:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
b_a_betterperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,100
My Photos: (9)
Only GM North America could figure out how NOT to sell a great car like this.

The GTO name immediately got people relating it back to the old days -- which wasn't fair. The old cars were good for their time -- but it was definitely time to move on -- and forward. This whole retro thing came out of nowhere -- and bit the GTO on the bum because it was -- horror of horrors, a clean and modern design. Hood scoops? Dang, too bad drum brakes and 70 series bias ply tires weren't options, too.

Look at the opportunity GM pissed away. By selling Holden Monaros through Pontiac dealers -- all the retro BS would have been avoided. They would have had a hot and valuable new brand -- and could have looked at bringing other hot Aussie cars over here under the same premise.

Instead, they turned this whole thing into one big flop in the public's eyes. What a shame.

Thanks for the heads up on this article. I'm talking to the wife tonight about buying another one and sticking it into long-term storage so there will be at least one new available when my '04 wears out.
b_a_betterperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 11:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 65
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATGIRL
I personally think they maybe making room for a come back of the Trans-Am...!
I agree. A sister to the Camaro would not be another GTO, it would far more likely be a Firebird/Trans Am.
slowride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 12:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 22
My Photos: (0)
honestly, with all the problems i've had with my gto and waiting for parts for over 4 months b/c it was "backordered" and basically visited every country in asia before hitting US soil, im glad they're stopping.

they need to make muscle cars on our soil. AND they need to take responsibility for poor engineering. I mean why should i have to replace my tires every 10k miles b/c it rubs the strut......
PulseRedGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 01:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 150
My Photos: (0)
End of Days

The fact GM is discontinuing the GTO only adds to the myriad reasons I'm happy to have one. Unlike Mustangs, etc, I'll never see myself coming and going. In the end, the scarcity will only increase the panache and value. I've never understood why the auto magazine 'experts' shortchanged the vehicle but that hasn't affected what I know to be true about my '05. It looks like an adult's machine, it is a blast to drive, and it will run with the big dogs.
Gotagoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 01:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by b_a_betterperson
Only GM North America could figure out how NOT to sell a great car like this.

The GTO name immediately got people relating it back to the old days -- which wasn't fair. The old cars were good for their time -- but it was definitely time to move on -- and forward. This whole retro thing came out of nowhere -- and bit the GTO on the bum because it was -- horror of horrors, a clean and modern design. Hood scoops? Dang, too bad drum brakes and 70 series bias ply tires weren't options, too.

Look at the opportunity GM pissed away. By selling Holden Monaros through Pontiac dealers -- all the retro BS would have been avoided. They would have had a hot and valuable new brand -- and could have looked at bringing other hot Aussie cars over here under the same premise.

Instead, they turned this whole thing into one big flop in the public's eyes. What a shame.
I couldn't agree more!!!!!!! Bringing this $60K vehicle to the US and badging it as a Pontiac is like Sears taking a Sony TV and putting Silvertone on it... UNBELIEVABLE !!!!!!!!!! There isn't another GM badged vehicle in this country that I'd even take a look at!
73LS4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


  Pontiac GTO Forum > GTO Forum Discussion > In the News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.