Which Cam - Pontiac GTO Forum
Pontiac GTO Pontiac GTO Forum

» Auto Insurance
Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Technical Discussions
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance

GtoForum.com is the premier Pontiac GTO Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2009, 10:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
zzomby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Payson, Utah
Posts: 97
My Photos: (10)
Garage
Which Cam

Does a Ram Air III cam have a rough idle to it or is it smooth. I don't know how to read those cam charts. If not what cam would you recommend for that rough racy sound? 65' 389_Thanks.
zzomby is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-18-2009, 07:34 AM   #2 (permalink)
67 Basket Case Restorer
 
Too Many Projects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 2,668
My Photos: (27)
Garage
It will have a bit of an irregular idle to it but not that raged, chop you hear from the SBC's. The problem with the rough choppy idle is the torque doesn't begin building until after 2500 rpm and goes to around 6500. Most Pontiacs work better in a lower torque range and run a milder cam. You can still run more lift and duration but the lobe centers need to be wider to eliminate the chop to get the power at low rpm. A buddy of mine has a 406 sbc with a 700r4 in a 68 Camaro and he hated the rough idle cam he had. No low end power and always wanted to die at stop lights. We changed the cam for one with a wider lobe center but still has .500 lift, 284 duration. It idles almost smooth for that much lift but the torque range comes in around 1500 and pulls strong to 5,600, which is perfect for the street. The car is much easier to drive and more fun now. The rumpity-rump cams get attention at the shows and the drive-in but they aren't the best for real-life driving or street performance.
__________________
Mitch
1967 GTO; Gulf Turquoise on Black, 4 speed bench
1967 Camaro ss/rs 350
1966 Chevelle SS 396
1970 Chevelle SS 396
1966 Corvair Corsa convert
1965 Corvair Monza convert
1969 GMC K1500
1952 Chev 2 ton flat bed
1938 Chev coupe
Too Many Projects is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 11:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Rukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 9,288
My Photos: (16)
Pontiac really did their homework back in the day. Grab yourself a `65 Tri-Power cam, it has just a slight lumpy idle, pleanty of vacuum for power brakes and lots of tourqe on the bottom end. Check out my videos in my sig, you can get an idea of what a 389 with that cam sounds like. Keep in mind I have a very conservitive exhaust on the car.
__________________

Restoration pictures password is 'GTO'
Burn-out videos.
Rukee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 11:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 6,635
My Photos: (2)
I agree with Rukee. Put an "068" tripower cam in it, you'll thank us years from now if you drive it a lot. I put a Sig Erson Hi-Flow I in my '65 when I overhauled it in 1981. It's still in there. It lopes, it stings your eyes with the hydrocarbons at idle, it lets raw fuel into the crankcase if your idling for any length of time. Yes, it runs like stink, It sounds bad-a**, but it was a lot cooler when I was 2o years old. If you don't know how to read the cam charts, you can learn, or you can consult the experts. There are a lot of excellent websites on the 'net that have that kind of information. Jim Hand articles, etc. Good luck.
geeteeohguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 01:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 69
My Photos: (0)
I believe Pontiac used two different cams for the Ram Air III engines.
The 744 cam was used for 4 speed, steep geared cars (trans and gearing made up for the torque loss from the 744) and the 068 cam was used for automatics with milder gearing. Pontiac eventually switched to the 068 for all the Ram Air III engines.
I have run both cams in a '68 Firebird with a .030 389 (395cid) and the torque difference is felt, especially with an auto trans.
Here is a Bonni with a 389/068 cam engine:
Be aware that his idle is set too low.
The 068 is also known as the HO cam.
I think you'll be find with the 068 cam.
Silver69GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 10:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
zzomby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Payson, Utah
Posts: 97
My Photos: (10)
Garage
Thanks for your input. I will attempt to make a good video for you. It won't stand up to Rukee though. Nice work. all I know about the cam is that the guy that I bought the motor from says it's a ram air III. I will never go that route again. I think it's best to know what's inside lol. I'm just glad you guys are so patient with me and willing to help. Thanks again to everyone. At the moment I need to wire the alternator, starter and coil. What a mess I have going there Later.
zzomby is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Technical Discussions


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Valve spring selection for new cam PAULCAPASSO Engine Discussions 24 02-27-2009 08:38 PM
Purchasing a GTO auto or manual Soulonfire11 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 28 08-19-2008 07:27 PM
'05 GTO cam install & selection question cat1055man Engine Discussions 45 12-24-2005 05:07 PM
New Cam!!! GTODEALER 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 11 08-25-2005 12:40 PM
Cam Question IPOCKALYPSE Service, Maintenance and Technical Discussion 12 03-18-2005 09:15 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.