Back to 326, or go bigger cu in ? - Pontiac GTO Forum
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-05-2009, 09:46 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Back to 326, or go bigger cu in ?

My 67 lemans revamp is going well, passed inspecition, on the road, and enjoying it. Turbo 350 working well and enjoying lower 1st gear vs. 2 speed auto. Here's the next cross roads: It has 1970 350 w/Edelbrock 4bbl and intake which is obviously not erra correct, and the motor has some issue such as me figuring out it has some stripped out head threads for a couple header bolts on both sides (nice surprise!), and a mashed motor mount, and I think the rear seal has a slow oil leak. So essentially the motor has to come out. But hey it's winter right?

When I bought the car, the guy gave me the original 326 block and heads, the story was that it blew a head gasket and instead of fixing it they dropped the 350 in. Lord only knows the whole story, but it does turn freely. I am leaning toward a standard rebuild of the 326 with original exhaust manifolds (fewer leak issues) and putting the intake manifold and 4bbl I have on the 350 on the 326. According to the year 1 engine charts a 67 326 with a 4 bbl would be about 285 hp, which is about what I could get out of some of the 70 era 400s that are available around on craigslist for about $1,000, or even the 350 that's in it. I can't really spend much more than about $2,000 on this phase. So what do you guys think, I'm not as up on all the options as I should be? A) should I/can I rebuild the 326 using the 350 bolt ons for under $2K? B) should I repair the 350 and just enjoy, C) Should I buy a nice running 400, D) or other ideas. Thanks, I always appreciate discussions. Don
67lemans is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-05-2009, 12:38 PM
67 Basket Case Restorer
 
Too Many Projects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 2,717
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Garage
I would disassemble the 326 and have it inspected. If it is sound and rebuildable, I would consider doing that. You can do the upgrades you mention to the factory HO specs and even more while retaining the original appearance outside. If you will be happy with the hp output, it is always cool to see the born with engine in these old cars. If it's power you're after, go for a 400. You can't get the displacement out of the 326 to match a 400. We all know if it's power we want, "there's no replacement for displacement"....

Mitch
1967 GTO; Gulf Turquoise on Black, 4 speed, buckets SOLD
1967 Camaro ss/rs 350
1966 Chevelle SS 396
1966 Chevelle Malibu
1970 Chevelle SS 396
1962 Impala SS
1952 Chev 2 ton flat bed
1938 Chev coupe
Too Many Projects is offline  
post #3 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-05-2009, 05:13 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
I agree with the above post. The 326 is a good engine, durable and under rated. I've driven and owned several in the past, and the performance can surprise you. It won't have quite the power of a similar 400 or 389, but built to stock 326 HO specs, it can be a stormer. Also, it's way more interesting (and rare) these days to see a '67 Lemans with a nice 326 in it. As a tidbit, I once drag raced my '66 Coronet with a 440, 4 speed, 3.23 posi, cam and headers against a '65 GTO with a 326, 4 speed, 3.23 posi, cam and headers. I beat the GTO by about 1 car length. The Coronet was a fast car, but that little 326 was no slouch, either!
geeteeohguy is online now  
 
post #4 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-05-2009, 05:33 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks guys. That is what I'm thinking too. I didn't mention I had a 67 Lemans in HS with a tough little 326 and a turbo 400 with shift kit.

Do you estimate the accesories from the 70 pontiac 350 bolt onto the 326 (like water pump, alternator, power sterring, intake, exhaust, etc.)? And, what things would you make sure you did on the rebuild?

As always thanks and appreciate the advice. Once I get the rally wheels on it I'll post some pics.
67lemans is offline  
post #5 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2009, 10:29 AM
 
6T5GOAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Just use the same brackets and accessories from the 350. The outside block dimensions should be the same on both engines.

Johnny
6T5GOAT is offline  
post #6 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-08-2009, 01:17 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67lemans View Post
My 67 lemans revamp is going well, passed inspecition, on the road, and enjoying it. Turbo 350 working well and enjoying lower 1st gear vs. 2 speed auto. Here's the next cross roads: It has 1970 350 w/Edelbrock 4bbl and intake which is obviously not erra correct, and the motor has some issue such as me figuring out it has some stripped out head threads for a couple header bolts on both sides (nice surprise!), and a mashed motor mount, and I think the rear seal has a slow oil leak. So essentially the motor has to come out. But hey it's winter right?

When I bought the car, the guy gave me the original 326 block and heads, the story was that it blew a head gasket and instead of fixing it they dropped the 350 in. Lord only knows the whole story, but it does turn freely. I am leaning toward a standard rebuild of the 326 with original exhaust manifolds (fewer leak issues) and putting the intake manifold and 4bbl I have on the 350 on the 326. According to the year 1 engine charts a 67 326 with a 4 bbl would be about 285 hp, which is about what I could get out of some of the 70 era 400s that are available around on craigslist for about $1,000, or even the 350 that's in it. I can't really spend much more than about $2,000 on this phase. So what do you guys think, I'm not as up on all the options as I should be? A) should I/can I rebuild the 326 using the 350 bolt ons for under $2K? B) should I repair the 350 and just enjoy, C) Should I buy a nice running 400, D) or other ideas. Thanks, I always appreciate discussions. Don
unless your intention is to restore a numbers matching car i wouldnt waste time and money on a 326 or a 350. since all the outside dimensions are the same i would put a 400 in it.
freethinker is offline  
post #7 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2009, 01:15 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Where I am confused, (showing my ignorance as I'm just getting back into this) is when I look at the engine and head ID charts around. They seem to show that a 326 with #140 heads would be about 250 hp, or 350 with #17 heads = 265 hp. Many of the later 400s which seem to be most available around craigslist etc. are listed as lower compression and therefore don't show to generate that much hp. What am I missing here? Torque? Or are you guys doing something to them to get 300+ hp? Thanks.
67lemans is offline  
post #8 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2009, 06:52 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Cubic inches = horsepower, all else being equal. A comparably cammed and built 400 with '70 or earlier heads will out perform the 326. A '67 250HP 326 with 10.25 compression will outperform a '77 400 with 165 horsepower and 7.6 compression. Up the compression on the '77 400, and install a decent cam, and it will out torque and out muscle the 326. All else being equal, bigger is better. That said, it's pretty rare to see a '67 LeMans with its born-with 326 in place, and to me, a lot more interesting than "just another 400". Just my opinion. If you want to cruise, and you want to be unique, build the 326. If you want to run fast and hard, build a 389-400-421-428-455. A friend once had a tripower '65 326 Lemans and the thing screamed.
geeteeohguy is online now  
post #9 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2009, 06:54 PM
Former Moderator
 
68greengoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 3,523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I guess you need to define how later. Here are some examples of 400's with 300+ hp:


1967 400 325,335,360HP 670 2.11/1.77 72cc

1968 400 335,350,360HP 16,62 2.11/1.77 72-75cc

1969 400 330,335,350,366HP 16,62,48(MT) 2.11/1.77 72cc

1970 400 350HP(GTO) 12(MT) 2.11/1.77 72cc

1971 400 300HP 96 2.11/1.77 96cc

Afetr '71 performance started to drop like a rock.... '70 was pretty much the peak year for performance...



SOLD.....
462ci, 4spd
Performer Intake, Mild Cam
Pertronix Ignitor III
Accel Super Coil, Accel 8.8mm Wires
68greengoat is offline  
post #10 of 18 (permalink) Old 12-09-2009, 07:40 PM
 
66tempestGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montevallo,al
Posts: 1,373
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the horsepower #s you see are supposed to be peak power. if you arent racing, then more than likely lower rpm torque gives you more seat of the pants feel and tire smoking ability. if your engine makes 300hp at 5000 rpms but you only rev it that high ocasionally, and only for a couple of seconds at a time what is the point. torque rules! i dont know the #s by heart but i think the late model engines still have loads of torque.
66tempestGT is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac Tempest, Lemans & GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO General Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Pontiac GTO Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Removing Back Seats & Back Center Piece chucksgto Interior Discussions 4 12-04-2008 08:32 PM
Car back after heads & intake porting LOWET 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 4 09-09-2008 11:02 AM
Back From Vacation! NJG8GT The Lounge 2 08-24-2008 07:11 PM
Trunk Room and Back Seat Access mrbcruzn 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 18 03-29-2007 01:44 PM
Just back from 1/8 Mile drags with 05 A4 bogie1 2004-2006 GTO General Discussion 13 03-17-2005 10:13 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome