Numbers Matching - What it means to you... - Pontiac GTO Forum
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-24-2010, 11:24 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Numbers Matching - What it means to you...

Second post - I think I am going to like it here....

I am sure that has been covered here before, so administrator - feel free to redirect me....

I would love to get a few opinions on what "Numbers Matching" means to you?

Here are the three definitions that I have heard and would love some clarification on this (tweak, add-to, delete, disagree/agree with these three).

Defintion #1 = All parts and peices on the car are original to the day the car rolled off the line. Nothing has been replaced or upgraded. The car can be a restored vehicle, but the engine, trans., rear end, intake, heads, carbs, guages, coloring (anything that makes the car unique) must be original to the car. Paint, interior, glass, chrome, etc can be replacements, but they need to be accurate to the nth degree.

Definition #2 = The car is "factory correct", but some of the original "core" (outside of what is VIN specific) equipment has been replaced with factory-made components that are date coded earlier (how much earlier is acceptable?) than the production date of the car. All options on the car are present and none have been added/removed/replaced. A 4bbl car is a 4 bbl car, a 4 speed is a 4 speed, etc. The engine could have been replaced (or trans, or rear end, etc), but the replacement component cooresponds to a part that could have been "grabbed" during the production of the vehicle. This gets gray when you are talking about certain components being VIN specific and others (like pre-VIN blocks not being). This definition would state that VIN specific parts need to obviously be present in order to be "numbers matching". In addition to VIN other codes are required to be present (such as an engine code being present that matches the car in is residing in).

Definition #3 = The car has been rebuilt over time (either through maintenance or restoration or both) with components that are of the correct model year (date codes could be slightly behind/after production date), components used could add/delete options that were not present on the original build sheet. An example of this would be a factory in-dash tach on the build sheet and a clock on the restored ride. Or a tri-power convert car that has a date coded intake that matches up with the car (either pre or post production, but within reason). Obviously under this definition there is some freedom in "what dealers migh thave done back in the day".

There are obviously differing views on what is meant by "numbers matching", "factory correct", and "original". And there are obvously a whole host of individual defintitions out there.

I would love to hear some of them.

JR
64ragtop is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 08:22 AM
 
Thumpin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Marquette Mi
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It depends on the vehicle, some didnt have the VIN stamped on anything other than the body, such as early Mustangs and Cougars, so there is no way to tell what block was the original like we can with Pontiacs.

For the most part I am only interested if the number on the block is right, and to a lesser extent if the trans has the VIN stamped on the tag. Then again I am not the type of guy who worries about it unless its a rare vehicle, like the 72 455 HO Formula I have sitting here(1 of 276 and its a factory freak with no paint code and strange options). The guy I got it from did a lot of 'custom' work and tried to make it faster and now some HO specific parts are long gone. It would be nice to have the right intake, carb, distributor etc, but people seem to want way too much money for them. As long as the block is the one it came with from the factory, its good enough for me.

Going with all correct date coded tiny items is a bit too far unless you never want to actually use the car and it is just garage art/trailer queen.
Thumpin455 is offline  
post #3 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 08:55 AM
 
allpawl66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA.
Posts: 391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As far as a legal view , #s. matching means that the #s. on the parts match the original #s. that does not mean they are the original parts . Original #s. matching means original parts & #s. Be careful as i have seen people spend some big dollars & they are not original #s parts .
allpawl66 is offline  
 
post #4 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 10:59 AM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
To me, it used to mean that the car had the original engine, trans, and rear end in place. Later, I added that it also had to have the original distributor, manifolds, carb, etc.... Now, poeple consider numbers matching to be "correct for the car" parts, even if they're repro parts. So, what's more authentic? A '65 GTO with a set of Cragars that have been on it since 1968, or a '65 GTO with a set of repop RallyI's that were made in 2004? I agree, though. The "all parts must match" has never been a big deal for me. I lucked out with my '67, as it was an original car when I got it in 1983. My '65, not so lucky. I've had a lot of GTO's over the years, 6 four speeds and 3 automatics, and while ALL of the automatic cars had their born-with engines, NONE of the 4 speed cars did.
geeteeohguy is offline  
post #5 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 01:23 PM
Former Super Moderator
 
Rukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 9,919
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
To me, it used to mean that the car had the original engine, trans, and rear end in place. Later, I added that it also had to have the original distributor, manifolds, carb, etc.... Now, poeple consider numbers matching to be "correct for the car" parts, even if they're repro parts. So, what's more authentic? A '65 GTO with a set of Cragars that have been on it since 1968, or a '65 GTO with a set of repop RallyI's that were made in 2004? I agree, though. The "all parts must match" has never been a big deal for me. I lucked out with my '67, as it was an original car when I got it in 1983. My '65, not so lucky. I've had a lot of GTO's over the years, 6 four speeds and 3 automatics, and while ALL of the automatic cars had their born-with engines, NONE of the 4 speed cars did.
I think the wrong auto block in a early 4-speed GTO can be considered correct.
In the early days the dealers encouraged their customers to go out there and race. The 4-speed cars were harder on the engines then the auto cars and did blow up frequently. When the blocks were replaced under warranty at the dealer they installed auto blocks and transferred the components to that new replacement block. So for that reason alone, I think a properly date coded auto block in a 4-speed could be considered #s matching.
Rukee is offline  
post #6 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 03:03 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
The thing is, my protect-o-plate actually has my original engine number, and it is (was) a WS block. I put in a 1965 WT block out of a wrecked 4 speed '65 waay back when, and it is correct date-wise, but even if I were to get a WS block, the number would never match the original number on my protect-o-plate. How correct is correct? I think the 100,000 dollar GTO's would have to have the "born with" block, and have it verifiable. I COULD get a WS block and throw away my protect-o-plate, and nobody wouold be the wiser. No way I'll do that though!!! Many of the early stick cars blew their engines under warranty and the block was replaced with any available same-displacement short block. Engine codes meant nothing at the time. These were merely cars, and not expected to be collected 40 years later. My original WS engine supposedly went south at Baylands Raceway in the mid-late '70's....well out of warranty!!
geeteeohguy is offline  
post #7 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 09:00 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This is great stuff guys.

I agree that there is a level of reason that should be considered when nit-picking the originality of any car in question.

I have a 64 ragtop (yes, I promise to have pictures posted soon) that has a replacement engine - plain and simple, but it is a "3155" block (cast 2 months prior to my car's born-on-date). And since 64 thru a portion of 67 blocks came "VIN free", so it could be argued that the block matches the car. As we all know "facing" the front of the block and re-stamping it to the desired engine code is really tempting on a rebuild (and honestly I don't think it makes you a bad guy as long as you come clean when asked). But even if you didn't machine the face and left the wrong code on the block - it wouldn't make the car any less desirable to me. And as was mentioned it could be totally legit if the orig. engine was blown.

My car is a 4-speed that popped the motor at some point in its life. Fact is the car was fixed and kept a life on the road until I got hold of it - it was restored once (by me) and is "numbers matching" by casted date codes (block, head, intake, etc) - tranny and rear end are all original. And to be honest I just got lucky (I wouldn't have been surprised or upset if the codes didn't match up - they just happened to). I go round and round with my "uni-body" buddy that is ate up on hugger orange and racing stripes. It's a whole other world on planet camaro, but what I have learned is that they are rather loose on the term "numbers matching".

I feel that if you have a car that has restored "factory-built" core components (engine, heads, intake, carbs, etc that date code correctly for the born on date of the car) you have a numbers matching car. Even if those "core" components don't match the original build sheet - for things like tri-power or the transmission (3 speed to 4 speed for example). Seriously, how many goats got the "three-duce" steroid shot back in the day? More than a few I have been told. And if you scrambled your three speed, wouldn't you be tempted to replace it with a four speed? I don't think you bomb your numbers by doing so.

This is where you guys might disagree with me, but that's why I started this thread....

Great stuff.

JR
64ragtop is offline  
post #8 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 09:58 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
It's discussions like this that help the hobby and help us all learn more about what we're doing. It's a good thing. Planet Camaro. I used to hate Camaros, I don't know why.....I always blew their doors off. I guess it's because they were so COMMON. We used to say "Camaro's are like a$$holes: everybody's got one!". I like Camaros now, 25 years later. I think if you pull a three speed out of a car and replace with a correct dated 4 speed, the car is not mumbers matching. It didn't come with a 4 speed. Same with tripower. Real tripower cars are worth 30 to 50% more than the base 4 speed, for a good reason: they were rare then, and they (real tripower cars) are even rarer now. Every '64-'66 GTO I see at a show has a "dealer installed" tripower. Hogwash. I think there are more tripower GTO's on the road now than were ever produced. Just like Fuelie '57 Chevys, SS El Camino's, and '69 Z-28's. I think enjoying these cars is what it's all about, and I know that a tripower is way more fun than a 4 barrel. It is what it is. I DO have a problem with milling blocks to restamp a bogus 'authentic" code. YOU may disclose that it's a fake on your selling the vehicle, but the next owner(s) probably will not. It's simply fraud. If you leave it alone, you're being honest, and enjoying it for what it is: a great running engine. Pontiac engines don't care what code is stamped onto them! They all can be built to run any way you want them to run. Also, if the owner has the protecto-plate (like I do for my '65), it's proof positive that the car does or does not have the original block. On mine, the VIN and the engine number are plainly visible. Bottom line is, "numbers matching" is about as general a term as "restored" is. Let the buyer/collector be wise, get educated, and know what the risks are, so that he can make a sound decision as to what kind of car HE (or she) wants.
geeteeohguy is offline  
post #9 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 11:09 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Great comments Geeteeohguy - I feel that good debate/discussion among friends makes for a better informed population of enthusiasts (as you said).

It also might help those that are looking to spend real money on a car of their dreams to actually conduct better dillingence by asking the right questions. It also helps those of us that own a car know what we have and what we don't, so that we use the correct vernacular when describing our rides. Like I said when I started this thread - Numbers Matching is used very loosely, and terms like Factory Original, Correct, and others are gray too. I guess the term 100%, Entirely, or All - followed by Original is pretty black and white.

My thoughts are if you face the block with the code you are after, that's your perogative. If you sell it as anything but a redo - it's fraud. But the fact that you did it doesn't make you a bad person. If you sell your motor as original when it obviously isn't, that's what makes you a bad person.

I deal with some military aircraft resto freaks on occasion and they have no issue taking tail sections and emblazoning them with the "correct" markings (then scuffing them a bit to get the "look" they are after). I guess the tail sections that contained the lettering were the first things to be picked (or blasted off and painted over) when these planes were mothballed.

These are museum resto's and they need them to match the grainy black and white photos in the display. They are only after a show peice that when described matches what they are describing. I see faced blocks in the same light. But it's a different ball game when you sell the block as "original" when it's not. As you said, protecto-plates and build codes from PHS should erase all doubts, which is a very, very good thing.

I am coming around to you on what is "Nuimbers Matching" when it comes to options that are on the car that aren't on the build sheet. I think you could have "Model Year Correct" (another term?) components such as Tri-power added (or a four speed), but you're right it would not be a numbers matching car. I wonder if you had Tri-power on the car, but had the original four barrel ready to install if you could still claim the term....or would you have to come up with another one...WHERE DOES IT END?

No doubt that there are more tri-powers now compared to then...

Anyway, it's fun to chat about. How 'bout this scenario...you add something like a console or power steering to the car (no replacing occurs - just adding) - do you still qualify as numbers matching? Again, where does it end....

Thank goodness for PHS - on planet Camaro they don't have such a fantastic resource and have to rely on owner-retained documentation (good luck with that staying ethical....)

I lump Camaro's and Mustangs into the a**hole analogy. With Corvettes not too far behind....especially the newer ones (you know the type)...they think they are super cool until they have to share an intersection stop with a guy like you.....in a ride like yours....

Ah, the power of nostalgia.

JR
64ragtop is offline  
post #10 of 21 (permalink) Old 04-26-2010, 12:00 AM
 
Richard Boneske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Winnconne, Wisconsin
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There is a larger percentage of GTO's with Tripower than the factory built--not total cars with Tripower, but percentages of those that survived. At least 1/4 of '64-'66 GTO's had factory Tripower.

"Numbers matching" only means someone took the trouble to find parts with the right date codes on them. Hardly any GTO's have the original alternator, starter, water pump, spark plug wires, belts, or heater blower motors on them. Most of them have had the original engine replaced and in many cases restamped to the "correct" code. Yes, there is a handful of cars that were almost never driven that retained the original parts mentioned above. These very low mileage cars are beyond what most of us can afford and it's completely out of the question to drive one.

If you could compare two GTO's in identical condition and colors that were built with the AFB four barrel carb, but one was fitted with Tripower, the Tripower one would fetch more money in any kind of a sale.

It's great for some of us, including me, to keep our GTO's like the factory built them, but that's not everyone's cup of tea. The quality of work done in the restoration is what makes some cars so desireable and valuable. If you can do some of this work yourself, it makes the car very personal to you regardless of whether the numbers match.

Bonestock Goats

'64 GTO HT Gulfstream Aqua(Wife's car)
'64 GTO CPE Grenadier Red(My car)
'04 GTO Starlight Black(Our car)
'07 Grand Prix GXP V8(Awesome car)
Richard Boneske is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac Tempest, Lemans & GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Pontiac GTO Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help Matching Numbers Comicazy 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers 4 06-09-2016 01:18 PM
Not Numbers Matching texaz 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers 17 06-03-2009 06:05 PM
Confused on numbers matching with a 65 jsmaem1106 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers 7 03-09-2009 12:16 PM
matching numbers bamm 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers 10 01-16-2009 11:39 AM
NUMBERS MATCHING on a 1965 ? bigeasy 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Data Plate, Vin Tag and Drive Train Numbers 4 07-14-2008 09:17 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome