461 stroker advice - Pontiac GTO Forum
User Tag List

 2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-24-2016, 12:20 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
461 stroker advice

Starting my 461 build any tips.
My goal is a very street able motor with little or no track time
1970mint is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-24-2016, 01:17 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Injun Territory, 'Merica!
Posts: 1,611
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
What octane pump fuel do you have avail? Is 420 gross HP/500 ft lbs of torque at the flywheel with iron heads in the target range, or are you one of the guys that believes he needs 500hp at the rear tires? The latter is a much more expensive endeavor.
Pinion head is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-25-2016, 06:25 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
93 octane,
Here's what I got
6x4 iron heads/ ported.(97 cc)
1974 400 cid
Eagle 461 stroker kit with cast crank
Performer intake manifold
650 Holley ( prob too small)

And yes I am realistic about my expectations
1970mint is offline  
 
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-25-2016, 04:23 PM
Super Moderator
 
BearGFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springtown, TX
Posts: 5,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Garage
Couple questions...

What's the casting number on that 400? (passenger side rear of the block, below the deck, on the transmission mount area).

Yeah, 650 is going to be a little small. if you want to stay with that manifold and a square bore carb, you're probably going to want at least 800 if not a tad more. Check out AED, Quickfuel, or Demon.

With 97 cc iron heads (you did actually measure them, right?), flat top pistons (which usually have 6 cc's in the valve pockets), factory .045 (compressed) gaskets, and zero-decking the block (which I strongly recommend) you'll be at 9.358:1 --- dang near perfect for what you're building.

What are you thinking about for the rest of the valve train?

Recommend you get yourself a copy of Jim Hand's book, or the more recent one by Rocky Rotella (or both) for some more good tips on prepping your short block.

Holler if we can help more.

Bear

BearGFR
Springtown, TEXAS
BearGFR is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-26-2016, 12:52 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
its the good casting number 4xxxxx, not the 5xxxxxx thinner block.
car is 1970 lemans
valve train is a ? need advice on cam( a little mean, but NOT a track cam)
car has 3.42 12 bolt posi
m21 munci
and yes i actually checked the cc's of each chamber with a kids medical . that's what gave me the 97 cc
1970mint is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-26-2016, 06:55 PM
Super Moderator
 
BearGFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springtown, TX
Posts: 5,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Garage
Power brakes? Any other accessories that might be sensitive to idle vacuum?

And the most important question: Budget. Considering all the horror stories I hear about people having problems with flat tappet valve trains these days, either due to low/no ZDDP in the oil to questionable metallurgy of the parts, the only way I'd recommend a flat tappet system over a roller would be if there were big concerns about cost. Rollers are quite a bit more expensive though. I'm running a solid roller in my 69, and I like it. With the way I drive the car, and how much I drive it - I tend to adjust the valves about twice a year, and I've never found them to be significantly "out" when I do. I even went to the extra trouble of installing oil restrictors in the lifter bores and all that. The cam profile I have has a little attitude, but it's not overly aggressive. Being a roller profile helps with that because the ramps, being steeper, allow more duration without forcing you into a lot of overlap - and it's overlap that affects streetability the most. At the time I built my engine, I chose mechanical over hydraulic due to the significant weight difference between solid and hydraulic roller lifters. If that's still the case, I don't know.
The cam I have has 236/242 degrees duration at .050 lift, LSA of 110, and it's installed at 106. Lift at the valves with 1.65 rockers is just a taste over .600. You can hear what it sounds like here:


That's about a 550 rpm idle.

Is that close to what you're looking for?

Bear
1968gto421 and stich like this.

BearGFR
Springtown, TEXAS
BearGFR is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-26-2016, 07:13 PM
 
stich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Pioneer CA
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Garage
Sounds Great Bear
stich is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-26-2016, 10:39 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1970mint View Post
Starting my 461 build any tips.
My goal is a very street able motor with little or no track time
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1970mint View Post
93 octane,
Here's what I got
6x4 iron heads/ ported.(97 cc)
1974 400 cid
Eagle 461 stroker kit with cast crank
Performer intake manifold
650 Holley ( prob too small)

And yes I am realistic about my expectations
I'll make a few comments, because that's what we do on forums.

The Performer intake, as well as the 650 will choke a 461. I'd recommend a good 800 Q-jet, like maybe an SMI stage 2.

http://www.smicarburetor.com/product...D2/9/sfID3/100

But, if you prefer a square bore, most consider the downleg booster type carbs, better than the cheaper straight leg type. If your budget is limited, I think the cheapest decent carb of this type is the old Holley 3310-1 that most call a "780 vacuum". There are still some of these around. Ebay usually has several used and rebuilds.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from...-1&_sacat=6000

If you have $500 to spend on new carb, Quick Fuel makes some nice vac sec street carbs.

http://www.amazon.com/Quick-Fuel-Tec.../dp/B003M96BHW

Some guys insist on a double pumper. But, I & many others prefer the vac secondary type. The last bracket car I bought had a 750 straight leg vac sec Holley. I figured I'd probably swap it out for a Q-jet. But it worked so good, I just kept it on there. No, the car was not quick at all, by today's standards. Ran 7.30's in the 1/8 mile. But, the carb, on a Torker 2 intake, left clean either from an idle, or a 2000rpm power brake--1.60's 60ft times. This was with 4.10 gears, slicks, and ladder bars.

So, the engine was probably making around 400hp or a little more & about 500ft lbs of torque. On the street, with hard street tires, the main problem with this engine would be traction. I just don't see why anybody would really NEED any more power than 400hp/500ft lbs. But, whatever.

The single plane intake is just fine for a 455+. If you want a single plane which will accept a square bore or Q-jet, one of the cheap Chinese intakes will work. They sell for about $150 on Ebay. I bought one. It actually looks real good to me. Haven't used it yet. Will probably save it for use with a Q-jet.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pontiac-326-...FUgQLF&vxp=mtr

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PONTIAC-326-...JUIuG9&vxp=mtr

Now, about the cam. I've done some price checking on all the parts for a complete roller cam set-up. The bottom line is that the roller will cost over $1000 more than a decent HFT set-up. The HFT will easily make a very streetable 400hp/500ft lbs. And, if you use either Hylift-Johnson 951R or Rhoads lifters(which are modified Hylift-Johnson), you are not likely to have any cam failure issues. Obviously, you need to use oil with sufficient amounts of ZDDP, or oil supplements with it, and follow proper break-in procedures. Lots of guys use the 15W-40 diesel grade oils, like Rotella T & Delo 400. I'm using Delo 400 & one bottle of STP, which contains ZDDP.

As for specific cam recommendations, they can vary WIDELY on the forums, depending on who you ask. So, I'll just post my thoughts and not argue with others. If you have power brakes, I'd use an 041 clone such as the Crower 60919 or Melling SPC-8, and Rhoads RL-9518 lifters.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Engine-Camsh..****jneN&vxp=mtr

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rh...w/make/pontiac

If you don't have power brakes and want a little rougher idle, you can run the Hylift-Johnson 951R lifters. Paul Knippen is a Pontiac engine builder who sells these lifters.

https://www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors/

There are certainly bigger cams you can choose, if you just want a nasty idle. But, these 041 clones are proven in 455 street Pontiacs. They will make lots of low end torque, and will pull to 5000rpm--just what most need for the street. IMO

Last edited by oldskool; 04-26-2016 at 11:21 PM.
oldskool is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-27-2016, 07:27 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
yes power brakes , a/c car.
my budget is not unlimited, I would like to save money where I can and spend it where I need it. this motor will not need to be beat on very often. I assume its going to be alot more fun than the small valve 350 i have in there now.
1970mint is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 04-27-2016, 09:54 AM
Super Moderator
 
BearGFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springtown, TX
Posts: 5,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1970mint View Post
yes power brakes , a/c car.
my budget is not unlimited, I would like to save money where I can and spend it where I need it. this motor will not need to be beat on very often. I assume its going to be alot more fun than the small valve 350 i have in there now.
Ok then, that helps. My car makes about 12" of vacuum at idle, which in my opinion (YMMV) would be marginal for power brakes. That's why I chose to convert to hydroboost during the build. You're going to want to pay very close attention to the overlap spec on the cam because that is what affects idle quality and idle vacuum the most. Overlap (you probably already know) comes from the combination of how aggressive the opening/closing ramps are, the lift duration, and the lobe separation angle (LSA) of the cam. If you decide to go with a flat tappet valve train (they definitely are less expensive) then you won't be able to run as much duration as you would be able to with a roller because the ramps can't be as steep as they can be with a roller. The 041 profile oldskool mentioned might be pretty good for you, combined with a set of controlled leakdown lifters (such as the Rhoads). That cam is pretty nasty in a 400, but in a 461 it would be a lot tamer - and the lifters help with that even more. Like everything else that involves these cars, you'll find opinions all over the map with regard to that type of lifter. Some love them, some hate them. I've never run them myself so I can't offer any first-hand knowledge. I "hear" they can be noisy, which by itself wouldn't bother me personally in the least, but I might be concerned about the effects of the 'hammering' that causes that noise in a system that wasn't designed for it (i.e. valves shutting harder than usual due to them closing while the lifter is still on the steep part of the cam, because of the leakdown effect at low rpm) --- but that's just Bear thinking out loud - I really have no direct experience. You can also tame overlap some by going with a wider LSA cam, and at 9.3:1 compression you should be pretty safe doing that. (Wider LSA's tend to build more cylinder pressure which can in some cases get into trouble with detonation).

Something you might consider if you're interested in such things, is licensing yourself a copy of the Performance Trends Engine Analyzer. That's what I did (I got the 'plus' version). It allows you to build a model of your engine (the more accurate measurements you have, the better) and then you can play around with different cam profiles, installations, "and stuff" to get a feel for what the end results would be. Once I got my inputs and settings right, it was scary-close to what my engine actually made on the dyno during break in. It's not a free program, but it's sure a heckuva lot cheaper than experimenting by swapping out parts.

Bear

BearGFR
Springtown, TEXAS
BearGFR is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac Tempest, Lemans & GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Engine Tuning and High Performance

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Pontiac GTO Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
461 stroker stalls in gear Norms68 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Technical and Electrical Wiring 6 03-29-2015 10:38 AM
461 stroker advice la_belle_fermier 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO General Discussion 13 11-14-2013 12:10 PM
New 461 Stroker Engine - Suspension Upgrade? jtwoods4 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 7 11-09-2012 04:12 PM
Building 461 Stroker reuse any parts? jtwoods4 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Projects, Barn Finds & Restoration Discussions 2 05-16-2012 09:12 AM
461 Stroker modifications jtwoods4 1964-1974 Tempest, LeMans & GTO Technical and Electrical Wiring 13 04-30-2012 11:19 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome