Engine Swap Options - Pontiac GTO Forum
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-19-2012, 04:46 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Engine Swap Options

So I'm currently restoring my 66 lemans (gto clone) convertible 4 speed. I love the car, I love working on the engines, and that throttle rumble from an american muscle V-8......................But we are now in 2012. Era of $4.50 a gallon gas prices and only going up from there. So now I'm looking at the engine trying to decide what to do. It is a tired old 400 2 bbl that will need a serious tune up and possibly rebuild. It's hard for me to justify putting money into an engine that will likely return single digit fuel economy numbers. I don't plan to drive it to work everyday but I would like to drive it at least a few thousand miles a year. Even a 10 mpg car vs 30 mpg a few thousand miles a year spells $1000 a year fuel savings or $10,000 over 10 years That's a lot of money!

So what are you GTO fans doing to fight the fuel prices? Any creative engine swaps I haven't thought of yet? LS1 is probably the most popular. What about the mustang 3.5 liter, rated at 31 mpg? Even those new turbo charged ecoboost 2.0 is getting crazy good MPG and has about the same power as the 400 thats in the car right now. But a GTO that sounds like a rice burner just wouldn't sound right. Anybody have that magic government conspriacy carb that gets 100 mpg that I've been hearing about since I was 10 (that's a joke)?
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-19-2012, 10:28 PM
 
leeklm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sell the GTO and buy a Ford Fiesta. In all seriousness, it your sole purpose was gaining better mileage, you would need to put on many thousands of miles to see an ROI. Now if your purpose is to take on the challenge, and have something cool to show off, well then hey, do it! When I need to save gas, I jump in my 2007 Pontiac GP and enjoy a ride that is much better than my 66, much quieter, much more comfortable seats, about as fast, but not nearly as fun!

I have a complete 5.7ltr from a 96 Impala SS with 3,000 miles sitting in my garage since 1998, but it will not be getting anywhere close to the 66!
leeklm is offline  
post #3 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-19-2012, 10:32 PM
Former Moderator
 
68greengoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 3,523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
What am I'm doing to fight fuel prices? Nothing. It is what it is. When the 455 says it needs gas, it gets gas. For us northern boys, these cars are used only for a handful of months a year, if we're lucky. It's my toy. I don't look at gas prices. I drive it, enjoy it and make sure there's always money for the tank.
Drop an LS1 in it. But what will that cost you to convert? Price of the motor etc? Probably could put alot of gas in that 400 before you break even. And a Mustang 3.5? Sell the car before you do that.......

Not trying to sound harsh in my response, but, if you're that worried about gas, this hobby is probably not for you......Just one man's opinion.....



SOLD.....
462ci, 4spd
Performer Intake, Mild Cam
Pertronix Ignitor III
Accel Super Coil, Accel 8.8mm Wires
68greengoat is offline  
 
post #4 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 12:01 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
I love everything about the car and have loved GTO's since I was about 5 years old. I love working on it. But I also have very hard time turning a blind eye when it comes to filling the tank. I can't help but do the math. 10 mpg vs a 25 mpg LS1 the driving only 3000 miles a year is a $1000 difference! That's a lot of money. Considering the 400 needs a rebuild it wouldn't take too long to pay for the ls1 swap.

I also bought the car because I wanted to drive it. I don't plan to trailer it to a car show or even enter it in a car show for that matter. Showing it off just doesn't do much for me. 't me it's all about driving it and it's hard to practically drive a 10 mpg car anymore. I guess the problem really has no solution.
post #5 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 12:46 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
if you do much driving on a freeway or similar, you might want to switch to an overdrive transmission.
But 10 miles to the gallon with a 2barrel? Methinks there is something else wrong. Are you driving for economy or spinning the tires all the time? :-)
What rear end gear ratio are you running?
Russ
russosborne is offline  
post #6 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 05:42 AM
Super Moderator
 
BearGFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springtown, TX
Posts: 5,742
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Garage
Gas mileage is about a whole lot more than just the engine. If you think that the engine out of a light Mustang that gives high mpg is going to produce the same results in a 4000 lb Pontiac, you're in for a very unpleasant surprise.

You say you want to drive the car --- ok, WHY do you want to drive the car? What enjoyment do you get out of driving it? If the reasons have anything at all to do with the car's "personality", then you probably wouldn't be happy with it after a swap anyway.

Also, don't totally discount the potential results of a fresh engine and appropriate gears. My own 69 GTO has a fresh engine and it's about as far away from a "mileage" engine as you can get. It makes 500 HP and is in a 4000 pound car that has 3.50 rear gears and no overdrive. On the highway it gets 11 mpg. I realize that's nothing to alert the media about, but considering what the car is and how it's built, that's pretty doggone good.

I'll bet you a buck against the hole of a rolling donut that your car with a fresh rebuild and "highway gearing" would deliver a lot closer to 20 than it would 10. No, that's not 30, but if you think you're going to get 30 mpg out of a 4000 lb. car by swapping in any engine that makes enough torque to actually move the car --- well like I said, you're in for a surprise.

Bear

BearGFR
Springtown, TEXAS
BearGFR is offline  
post #7 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 01:17 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Okay, here's my reality: the most modern cars I have are two GTO's....a '65 hardtop with a 4 speed, 389, tripower, and 3.36 gears. I've had it 30 years. It gets about 12-14 mpg. I don't drive it a lot, but it sure is fun. My '67 GTO convertible I've also had for about 30 years, and it has the original 4bbl 400. It is an automatic trans. It came with a 3.36 rear gear, too. It would typically get about 15 mpg. Not a real pig. About 3 years ago, I swapped in a 2.56 rear axle assembly from a '69....and now get a bit over 20mpg on long trips and on the freeway. At 75-80mph. Excellent fuel economy. The 400 easily burns rubber and pulls like a train, yet with the lazy gear, it just loafs along on the open road. I've driven this car all over the US, and it is my regular driver. I have two "modern" trucks, both Toyota's, but the newest CAR I've ever owned is my '67 GTO. Maintained and taken care of, these old Pontiacs can be fuel efficient and fun to drive at the same time. If you're really concerned about fuel economy, check into an overdrive transmission, auto or standard. There are guys on the other forum (pyforumsonline) who also get over 20mpg running real Pontiac engines with the proper gears and or an overdrive. These were well designed engines, and with a little care, work Just Fine. I've had a bunch of GTO's over the years, and NONE of them got single digit fuel economy. Expect 10-12 mpg for a high HP, steep geared monster like Bear's, and high teens to low 20's for a mild combination like mine.
geeteeohguy is online now  
post #8 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 01:21 PM
64-67 Expert
 
geeteeohguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 8,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Another thing: with your tired old 2bbl 400, a simple engine rebuild with a decent cam, 87cc heads (or custom pistons) and a Quadrajet carb, combined with 3.08 gears to work with your 4 speed, you should get about 17-19 mpg going down the road. The Q-jet is more miserly on fuel than the 2bbl due to its design, but will give you all the power you need when you decide to waste some fuel!!
geeteeohguy is online now  
post #9 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 05:23 PM
 
Instg8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Near Detroit
Posts: 3,931
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
Okay, here's my reality: the most modern cars I have are two GTO's....a '65 hardtop with a 4 speed, 389, tripower, and 3.36 gears. I've had it 30 years. It gets about 12-14 mpg. I don't drive it a lot, but it sure is fun. My '67 GTO convertible I've also had for about 30 years, and it has the original 4bbl 400. It is an automatic trans. It came with a 3.36 rear gear, too. It would typically get about 15 mpg. Not a real pig. About 3 years ago, I swapped in a 2.56 rear axle assembly from a '69....and now get a bit over 20mpg on long trips and on the freeway. At 75-80mph. Excellent fuel economy. The 400 easily burns rubber and pulls like a train, yet with the lazy gear, it just loafs along on the open road. I've driven this car all over the US, and it is my regular driver. I have two "modern" trucks, both Toyota's, but the newest CAR I've ever owned is my '67 GTO. Maintained and taken care of, these old Pontiacs can be fuel efficient and fun to drive at the same time. If you're really concerned about fuel economy, check into an overdrive transmission, auto or standard. There are guys on the other forum (pyforumsonline) who also get over 20mpg running real Pontiac engines with the proper gears and or an overdrive. These were well designed engines, and with a little care, work Just Fine. I've had a bunch of GTO's over the years, and NONE of them got single digit fuel economy. Expect 10-12 mpg for a high HP, steep geared monster like Bear's, and high teens to low 20's for a mild combination like mine.
with the 2:56 gear and the 463 i was getting close to 20 HWY, have a 3:55 12 bolt sitting in the shop and it will probably not get installed until gas comes down, no need, i don't race and the motor and rear combo will still obliterate the tires from anything up to a 20mph roll, show me a fiesta that will do that.

I also agree with 68GreenGoat the price of gas is the cost of entertainment especially for us non-sunbelt states, night at the movies costs me 60 bucks these days, thats a 110 mile round trip in the Tempest. I can wait to see the movie on net flix, but i can't wait to drive my car when it's nice out!!

Instg8ter is offline  
post #10 of 20 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 10:47 PM
 
KingJacobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 82
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I know you said you can't help but feel bad because of the poor fuel economy, but think about it. Did you buy the car to think about all the gas station trips, or for enjoyment of a REAL car with a sound and a V8 that you just don't see anymore?

These cars are a time warp, a tribute to a time where life was simpler (so is legend, I can't even legally order a beer yet LOL) and to pure automotive bliss. Roar or cruise down the road, you cannot beat these cars for that special feeling. Mileage should not be a dealbreaker, and as already said, get some 2.73 gears and a Q-jet carb and maybe even an OD tranny if you really lose sleep at night.

I've heard of people putting LS1s in old schools, but my best guess is you would need to beef up the stock internals, as they put down good horsepower numbers but torque is what you really need to move a car this big and heavy.

My dad said something to me yesterday that really changed my outlook on life. I asked if they made garage door windows that had UV protection (to protect a certain Pontiac) and he said of course, it's more expensive but it's just money.

You save $$ in some places and spend your hard earned money on the things you really enjoy in life. I'm the cheapest guy you've never met, but where is the joy in never enjoying the fruits of your labor?
KingJacobo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 1964-1974 Pontiac Tempest, Lemans & GTO > 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Pontiac GTO Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'04/'05 engine swap into '66 MAXXFJ 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 2 02-26-2012 08:44 AM
64 GTo engine swap Larry1945 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 6 11-30-2010 07:51 AM
Engine swap on a 70 and 66 jetstang 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 23 05-28-2010 07:23 AM
Engine swap, 250 6 cyl to 400 8 cyl Braveheart61 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 0 08-16-2009 12:28 PM
69 GTO 455 engine swap pbkgto 1964-1974 Tempest, Lemans & GTO Complete Engine Compartment Discussion 8 04-16-2009 08:34 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome