Hot data on cold air induction. Important. - Pontiac GTO Forum
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-14-2004, 08:31 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hot data on cold air induction. Important.

Like many of you, I've been looking for some affordable horse power and cold air induction has been one of the areas of some interest to me. I've checked out several of the aftermarket CAI's and have not been impressed. My major concern is that they pull air from under the hood, usually the last place to look for cold air. Additionally, many of these units are not emissions approved and they strike me as a tad pricey!

So I checked out the stock system to see if it could be the basis of a CAI. What I found was mostly good news. The air box has a large, forward facing opening, a generally smooth interior, adequate volume above and below the filter element, and a large diameter discharge opening to the MAF. I would like a larger filter but a K&N type filter would probably provide sufficent flow for most applications in the 400 to 500 HP range. The plastic MAF to throttle body pipe (MAF pipe) is a bit of a disaster in my opinion, with a reduced diameter, ribbed walls and sloppy heat welded plastic seams all combining to compromise air flow.

Conclusion #1: The MAF pipe needs to be replaced with a unit that is resistant to heat soak (plastic) and has a smooth interior with a nice transition to the throttle body. Power gains? My guess is no more than 10 and more like 3 or 4 HP.

Conclusion #2: Replace the stock filter with a K&N type filter. Power gains? Again not much, perhaps 2 to 4 HP on a good day.

Next I looked at the intake of the stock air box. Its' large opening passes through the front bulkhead and draws air from behind the left headlight. After a through inspection I concluded that the stock air box was an effective cold air system in the factory configueratioin. To confrm that this was indeed the case I did a little test. I purchased two digital indoor/outdoor thermometers. I placed the sensor for one unit (the reference temperature) on the bottom of the front bumper cap, this is where you generally like to put a ram air intake if you have that option. This placement put the unit out of the sun and in the fresh air stream as the car moved forward. I then suspended the sensor of the second unit in the center of the stock air box opening. I placed the display heads for both units on the dash and hit the road.

My results: At 55 mph with an air temperature in the low 70's the difference in temperature on both displays was less than one degree F at all times, while moving forward. At rest both readouts would climb, the reference unit always maintaining a lower temperature by 5-7 degrees F. Once in motion it only took about a minute for both displays to return to near identical readouts. The delay in temperature drop can be attributed to the so-so response time of the thermometers.

Conclusion #3: Aftermarket CAI's have little to offer the GTO.

My opinion: Current CAI's are of little value. I know that dyno results may improve (Remember dyno results on a cold air system are generally of little value because the hood is almost always open and the air flow over the vehicle is not normal because they cooling is done by external fan. Under these conditions even a really good CAI or even Ram Air Intake will often show little or no gain but track times will improve) when they are installed but there is no reason to believe, at this time, that this has anything to do with a reduction in intake air temperature. Any gains are more likely due to improved airflow through the air filter element and MAF pipe. Additionlly, most units have an open element which means that when you close the hood you are feeding your engine nice tosty preheated air, the exact opposite of the desired condition. Some have suggested that these CAI's produce power by repositioning the IAT (intake air temperature) sensor to a more desirable location. This may be the case, but such a change has nothing to do with the CAI's primary goal of delivering cool air to the throttle body. If data are available that show that relocating the IAT produces more power sign me up! I just cant see spending $200.00-$300.00 for a complete CAI when relocationg the IAT may be all that is needed.

So my plans for now are to look for a high flow MAF pipe (anybody know who has them and how much they cost?), get a K&N filter and see if I can extend the air box intake to some exterior location to create a "ram air" intake for the stock air box.


Ok folks, let's hear what you think,

Warren

Last edited by wakarr; 11-14-2004 at 09:17 PM.
wakarr is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-15-2004, 02:01 PM
 
GasTiresandOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 25 miles North of Frisco
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I will have to agree with your three conclusions. I think the stock air box is fine and should support as much air as needed so far. I think the stock paper filter should be replaced with the k&n panel filter. Also I would replace the stock induction tube with one of the CS tubes from NZ because of the carbon fiber and the smooth inside of the tube. Good conclusions!

1968 Pontiac GTO - Vendoro Green/Ivy Gold 400/4-speed/3.08 rear

2004 Pontiac GTO - Impulse Blue Metallic/Black/M6

GasTiresandOil is offline  
post #3 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-15-2004, 06:35 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the feedback. I've seen several people comment on the CS MAF pipe but I have yet to see a price or a web site that has any purchasing/product info. Perhaps you or some other member can help me out on this.

Thanks

Warren
wakarr is offline  
 
post #4 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-16-2004, 10:44 AM
 
GasTiresandOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 25 miles North of Frisco
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.csperformance.co.nz

1968 Pontiac GTO - Vendoro Green/Ivy Gold 400/4-speed/3.08 rear

2004 Pontiac GTO - Impulse Blue Metallic/Black/M6

GasTiresandOil is offline  
post #5 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-16-2004, 11:49 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the info on the CS pipe, it's a nice looking unit but I think I'll try making my own. I'll post the results when it's done.
wakarr is offline  
post #6 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-17-2004, 11:20 AM
 
westell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I put the K&N CAI on and like previous ones on my Fbods, I must say it makes a difference. The car lifts quicker and faster, the plenum is smooth and polished on the interior. the car gets the air from same area as oem air box.
seat of the pants says there's a little more there.

in addition to flow, remember, stock air intake boxes and entire systems are deisgned to be quiet in the cockpit. the K&N system certainly produces a throatier intake sound.

haven't dynoed yet, though. (huntin' season and all )

2004 Onyx Black, M6, Mods in excess of 250 characters excluding BB Code markup
westell is offline  
post #7 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-24-2004, 05:15 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Salem, NH USA
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakarr
Ok folks, let's hear what you think,

Warren
Thanks for sharing your views and findings... I find the Aussie sites are usually a good place to learn how "best" to gain HP at reasonable price/return ratios. http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5949

Thus, I believe the threads on other GTO sites in the US and Australia can point you in the right direction.

The following is an image that describes where to place the hole, the site explains how to.

The following seems reasonable for a new MAF pipe. http://www.capa.com.au/ls1_induction.htm

I hope my references in this reply comply with editors wishes...

Best wishes, Bio

A squealing tire is a happy tire.
bioinformaticus is offline  
post #8 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-25-2004, 01:05 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for those helpful links. I plan to start work this weekend. I'll keep you posted.

Warren
wakarr is offline  
post #9 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-28-2004, 11:05 AM
EDC
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How about this type of home made inlet?

Worth 1.5 mph in the 1/8 over stock.

Ed



AFR 205 - Comp - Jesel - FAST - Kooks - Flowmaster
Precision Industries - TransGo - M/T - Bogart
HP Tuners - Raceware Central - FTI
Stock shortblock and driveline
All motor 11.73 @ 114.70
FlowTech Induction




EDC is offline  
post #10 of 25 (permalink) Old 11-30-2004, 01:13 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I like it! Now that's Hot Roddin'.
wakarr is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Pontiac GTO Forum > The 2004-2006 GTO > Service, Maintenance and Technical Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Pontiac GTO Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome