Well, for me it was the fact that I had leg and head room in it - not the same with the stang. I also like the fact that the trunk is small so people won't ask me to help them move or carry their luggageidareu said:Do you think that yout 04 Gto is better than a 03/04 cobra?
If so why? arty
Unlike Ford, who builds a $125k "supercar" and then must recall it due to serious manufacturing and design flaws?aniversarysnake said:since when is a muscle car supposed to be refined? The truth is that its not that bad even when you look at the vett and the viper. they both use parts from bottom of the barrel cars like neon and cavalier, and your paying 50,000-80,000 for those. but people don't buy them for those reasons, well at least I don't. this car is scary fast and can only get faster for a realativly low cost.
Since you obviously have your head inserted in your anus sufficiently far to have very little contact with current events, I've decided to take pity on your ignorance and post the news item on Ford's latest embarrassment.aniversarysnake said:First I'm not getting defensive, just pointing out some facts. I came here to check out what the whole fuss was with the GTO being so cheap. You have idareu to thank for that.
As far as the Ford GT is concerend I have not heard any recalls or problems so I cannot comment on that. As for my grammar, well this is a forum and not a paper for my college class but if you need help reading I made it a little better.
Ford Tells 2005 GT Owners "Not To Drive Their Vehicle Under Any Circumstances."
19 December 2004
Ford will quietly notify dealers who have 2005 GT models in their inventory that they may not drive, demonstrate or sell the vehicles until two recalls are performed. According to a Ford memo, representatives from Ford will contact GT owners individually and instruct them "not to drive their vehicle under any circumstances."
In the first of two recalls, Ford will inspect the fuel system of all GTs made from 13 October 2004 through 19 November 2004. Some of the Ford GTs may require the installation of a new fuel tank.
The second recall to be issued will be safety related due to defective suspension control arms. The safety recall will include all GTs made from JOB1 (30 June 2004) through 11 December 2004. According to a Ford memo, "Ford has identified a quality issue with the suspension control arms on the affected vehicles which may adversely affect vehicle handling in the event of a control arm fracture. In the event a customer does not seek service for the diminished handling concern, a crash potentially could occur." Replacement parts should be available to dealers by 01 February 2005.
According to sources, Ford may issue a future recall to replace the rear engine exterior cowl cover due to alleged cracking issues. A BlueOvalNews article published on 07 September 2004 alleged that the cylinder heads on the GT may be defective, however, no such defects have been reported.
These recalls may garner (either fairly or unfairly) more negative media attention toward Ford for several reasons. First, the GT is supposed to represent Ford's best build and quality efforts - this is Ford's total image product and, second; Ford (like all domestic brands) is already under immense scrutiny for their product quality.
Ford has manufactured 470 GTs from 30 June 2004 to 11 December 2004 at the Wixom, Michigan Special Vehicle Center.
WTF is a Coba? You mean Cobra.The Coba is a Ford
Ah yes when in doubt try 2nd grande insults to make yourself feel better. Well seems like I have a life and do enjoy it, sue me for not knowing every little piece of information on the web (someone has to much time on there hands). Oh and just to add a little portion of what the article says.Since you obviously have your head inserted in your anus sufficiently far to have very little contact with current events, I've decided to take pity on your ignorance and post the news item on Ford's latest embarrassment.
*ahem* *cough* 2006 C6 Vette Z06 *cough*aniversarysnake said:I would like to see GM pull off something of this magnitude. Hell, they haven't even attempted anything like this and succesfully pulled it off.
Please. Drop the victim act. You came to troll, and you know it. Perhaps it was a lame attempt at a retaliatory strike for whatever bvllsh1t idareu posted in your fetid cave, but he's a moron as well.aniversarysnake said:You know this forum seemed pretty interesting as a result I registered and posted my opinion. Now I see it is not very welcome, what a pity ...
Ew. That's disgusting. He should get arrested for that.aniversarysnake said:...well I guess I will go play with daddys cobra
Is there a rule saying I can't post my opinion on this forum? Thats all that I did.Please. Drop the victim act. You came to troll, and you know it. Perhaps it was a lame attempt at a retaliatory strike for whatever bvllsh1t idareu posted in your fetid cave, but he's a moron as well.
Sorry, next. The Viper will hand it its ass, I would like to see proof other wise. Oh yeah its not out yet.*ahem* *cough* 2006 C6 Vette Z06 *cough*
Really? Why is Chebby trying to stlye the Camaro like the old 60's version? Tell them its going to take a lot more than that to revive it. Honestly I hope they do but something tells me that we already know which "pony" car is here to stay.Retro is dead.
Some one should take there own advice maybe they would have made a wiser choice.Buh bye, Troll! Stay in school and maybe someday you can buy a real car instead of those nasty blue oval thingmies
I don't know whats worse implying some obscene sex act or you actually thinking it. Either way shows us whats truly on your mind.Ew. That's disgusting. He should get arrested for that.