G
Guest
·After hearing and reading so many positive things about the GTO, I had to test drive one yesterday.
What a let-down.
It could have been my neighbor's new Solara with a strong motor.
Where is that character I was expecting?
You can't see the hood, so there is no visual feed-back from that.
The funny hump in the rear blocks 15% of the view out the back.
The interior is SO generic.
Yeah, it's a great stealth car, but it's even stealthy to the driver.
Maybe my expectations were unrealistic, coming from the time when I rode around in buddy's new '65 and '66 GTO's. But I know that new cars CAN have pizzaz.....it's just that the GTO lacks it.
Might make a good high-speed, long-distance tourer for two and a little luggage? [It is a GT(O), after all!] Even then, the tiny trunk would just about take a medium duffle bag, so you have to use the rear seat for storage.
Sadly, a muscle car it is not.
Oh, well, one more legend vaporizes. (for me anyway)
I won't be looking at 2004 GTOs with lust in my heart any more.
Larry
:cheers
What a let-down.
It could have been my neighbor's new Solara with a strong motor.
Where is that character I was expecting?
You can't see the hood, so there is no visual feed-back from that.
The funny hump in the rear blocks 15% of the view out the back.
The interior is SO generic.
Yeah, it's a great stealth car, but it's even stealthy to the driver.
Maybe my expectations were unrealistic, coming from the time when I rode around in buddy's new '65 and '66 GTO's. But I know that new cars CAN have pizzaz.....it's just that the GTO lacks it.
Might make a good high-speed, long-distance tourer for two and a little luggage? [It is a GT(O), after all!] Even then, the tiny trunk would just about take a medium duffle bag, so you have to use the rear seat for storage.
Sadly, a muscle car it is not.
Oh, well, one more legend vaporizes. (for me anyway)
I won't be looking at 2004 GTOs with lust in my heart any more.
Larry
:cheers