Almost ready to put this 65 389 4bbl on the road. Was curious if anyone could clue me in on engine oil capacity and weight. Also conventional or synthetic oil?
Attachments
-
4 MB Views: 126
Given a stock-ish engine and you believe the 67 service manual...
View attachment 153455
I used to run conventional 10w40 in all my stock-ish V-8's, but have since changed to Rotella 15w40 (because like the smell better)...lol
Your engine build could like a different weight and that is something you should talk to the builder about.
Just for fun, the next time you change oil in the '67, only put 5 qts in the pan. Then remove the dipstick from the '65 and check the oil fill level. If both pans are the same, and have the same capacity, the 5 qt dispstick will read Full with the 5 quarts in the '67 pan. This would mean that the 6 qts is 1 qt over full and your '67 has a 5 qt pan + 1 filter for 6 qts.My '65 389 holds 6 quarts with the filter. Original pan and dipstick. My '67 GTO holds 7 quarts with filter. Original pan and dipstick. I use the long Wix filters and Shell Rotella 15/40 diesel spec oil, and have since about 2002. Prior to that, it was Kendall 10-30, no longer available. Run a high zinc/phosphorus oil like the diesel spec stuff, or the classic car stuff. Racing oil does not have the additive package needed for stop and go street use, nor the anti-corrosives. It's made to be run hard at the track and dumped.
If I were in a colder climate, I would run more expensive 10-30 high zinc boutique oil like Brad Penn. As hot as it is where I am, however, the 15/40 has been just fine. Many folks like to specify really heavy 20/50 oil, but for an engine that's set up to stock specs and not worn out, it's a bit thick.
I don't run synthetic oils in any of my old cars, and haven't in the 40+ years I've been driving them.
I leafed though an older Chilton's Repair book (not always the most accurate) that covers all car models and a span of certain years, and under the Pontiac section, all the 1955-63 engines show 5 quarts in the pan +1 for filter. However, is shows only 4 qts in the pan and +1 for the filter for the 1964 year model which mirrored the PY member's mention of all 1964 cars having the 4 qt pan - which seems odd.As Jim mentioned above;
Pontiac Service News Flash number 64-16 (10-18-63) and 65-53 (12-22-64) verified that the oil capacity on all Pontiac V-8 should be five quarts - six quarts with filter change. Some 1964 models were manufactured with a four quart dipstick; the five-quart dipstick , part number 9776085 (code MF), should be installed.
Also 389´s used a longer oil filter, at the time, with approximately 50 percent more oil in it than oil filters on 1967 and later engines.
Hi Jim. My '65 and '67's both have their original pans and dipsticks. As you know, I've had both cars 40 years. I have never thought about comparing dipsticks between the '65 389 and '67 400, but now you have me curious if they are even the same length. Here's a couple of shots from the original owner's manual from my '67, verifying the 7 quart fill. The 389 in my '65 does not take 7 quarts. I think it's 6 with filter. View attachment 153569 View attachment 153570
Hmmm. Where is the Full mark on the '65 dipstick if you marked a point 8" lower (at 17") to equal that of the '67 and then measured from that point to the Full mark. Do the Full lines now match up or is the '67 Full mark a quart higher (using the space/distance between Add and Full to determine the extra qt?).OK Jim....I checked both my dipsticks and here's the skinny: the '65 389 is 25" long from tip to ferrule, and the tube runs up along the valve cover. It says "Capacity 5 Qts. Do Not Overfill". The '67 does NOT run up along the valve cover....rather it comes out of the block and the loop is at the top of the head. So the tube is much shorter. The 400 dipstick is 17" long from tip to ferrule, and it says "Capacity 6 quarts Do Not Overfill"
So the '65 takes 6 quarts with the long filter or a bit more, and the '67 takes an additional quart. Both engines are non AC and have original dipsticks and pans from day one.
Swapping dipsticks would show nothing since the tubes are 8" different in length.
The distance from the tip of the dipstick to the 'full' mark varies by 1/2 inch. Interesting. Here's photos.Hmmm. Where is the Full mark on the '65 dipstick if you marked a point 8" lower (at 17") to equal that of the '67 and then measured from that point to the Full mark. Do the Full lines now match up or is the '67 Full mark a quart higher (using the space/distance between Add and Full to determine the extra qt?).
How about from the base/tip of the sticks to the Full mark. The same distance?
Hmmmm. The spread between ADD/FULL of the 2 sticks is different, BUT, the ADD marks are the same. So I am still sticking with the oil pans are the same, based on that ADD mark and the factory moved the FULL mark up on the stick which supports the story Milt Schornack said about warranty engine work and Pontiac added the extra qt dipstick to ensure the oil level was maintained higher. Remember, back in those days when you pulled into a gas station, you had an attendant who pumped your gas, cleaned your windshield and...............checked your oil.The distance from the tip of the dipstick to the 'full' mark varies by 1/2 inch. Interesting. Here's photos. View attachment 153703 View attachment 153704 View attachment 153705 View attachment 153706 View attachment 153707