Pontiac GTO Forum banner

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
711 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
I changed the intake on my '67, yesterday. I took off an Edelbrock Torker and replaced it with the factory correct '67 manifold. What a difference! It ran okay before, but it never felt like I remembered old GTOs to run. It's like a completely different motor. All the torque that I remembered these things to have, is back.

I can't figure out why the previous owner ran a Torquer on the street. I gotta hand to the GM engineers, they knew what they were doing. I can't keep from grinning when I drive it!

Cheers all!

Chuck
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,744 Posts
I changed the intake on my '67, yesterday. I took off an Edelbrock Torker and replaced it with the factory correct '67 manifold. What a difference! It ran okay before, but it never felt like I remembered old GTOs to run. It's like a completely different motor. All the torque that I remembered these things to have, is back.

I can't figure out why the previous owner ran a Torquer on the street. I gotta hand to the GM engineers, they knew what they were doing. I can't keep from grinning when I drive it!

Cheers all!

Chuck
If there ever was a manifold that was mis-named, the Torker for Pontiacs has to be it. It's a decent manifold for the upper rpm ranges, but the factory iron intake will eat it alive at low rpm. When I dyno'ed my 461 I did a back-to-back comparison between the factory intake and a Torker I. As you can see from the results, the T1 hangs on longer in the upper RPM ranges, but it gives up ground down low.

Bear
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,376 Posts
I agree bear. I always thought the Torker and Performer were misnamed, visa verca.. Single planes kill torque and make more high end HP. Everyone wants the tall single planes for the race look, but if your not turning R's it's a waste everytime. Small runners equal velocity and throttle response, big runners are for higher R's.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
686 Posts
back in the 80's most guys over cam'ed, over carb'ed, and put way way to big of intakes on there cars. I guess because it was cool. I run an old holley cast iron aftermarket intake on the 427 with a 750 vac sec carb, they are smaller then needed but it doesn't leak and has great drivability even with 13:1 compression.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
711 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
If there ever was a manifold that was mis-named, the Torker for Pontiacs has to be it. It's a decent manifold for the upper rpm ranges, but the factory iron intake will eat it alive at low rpm. When I dyno'ed my 461 I did a back-to-back comparison between the factory intake and a Torker I. As you can see from the results, the T1 hangs on longer in the upper RPM ranges, but it gives up ground down low.

Bear
Great info, Bear. Thanks!

I'm really pleased with the low end throttle response. It's exactly what I thought was going to happen.

The next step is to go through the Quadrajet (also date code correct) that I picked up with the manifold. I'm currently using the one that came with the car, which is a mid 70's unit. I went through it awhile back and it runs great, so I have time to rebuild the right one and really dial it in.

I'm diggin all the little things that I get to do on this thing. Every little thing makes me appreciate it more!

Chuck
 

·
64-67 Expert
Joined
·
8,561 Posts
Congrats, Chuck. Q-jets work great on '67's. Excellent economy if you keep your foot out of it, but a heck of a wallop when those gigantic secondaries kick in. Back in the late '70's, a lot of pimple faced Camaro owners were surprised when they tried to compet with my buddy's rock stock,full wheel covers with whitewalls, AC equipped, loaded, 2.93 geared '67 GTO.....I remember one second generation Camaro running neck and neck with the GTO at about 80mph, and the guy's girlfriend was waving goodbye to the GTO.....until my buddy kicked open the secondaries and it shifted down into passing gear and was GONE. The GTO was able to match the Camaro running on just the PRIMARIES. When the secondaries opened, the goat was in another county. Great stuff!!!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
106 Posts
If I'm looking to buy a factory intake and Q-jet for a '67, beyond ID#'s and correctish dates, what problems flaws should I be looking for? Were they prone to cracking? Do they warped?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
711 Posts
Discussion Starter #9
If I'm looking to buy a factory intake and Q-jet for a '67, beyond ID#'s and correctish dates, what problems flaws should I be looking for? Were they prone to cracking? Do they warped?
Look for cracks in the divider between the left and right sides. If possible have itmagnafluxed before you buy.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top