Joined
·
165 Posts
Unless i'm missing it in my '68 chassis manual somewhere, i can't seem to find the stock (non-RA/HO) exhaust manifold outlet diameter. 2.25 or 2.50, or none of the above? Thanks.
Not sure I have seen the tailpipes you speak of. My brother's '68 Bonneville had factory resonators which was part of the tail pipe assembly. These are essentially a small muffler that reduced the exhaust sound over what the mufflers did. I don't know how it was decided which cars got them and which ones didn't. My brother got rid of them when he put new tail pipes on without the resonators.Just quick question, what are the benefits if any of of the pinched off tailpipes for the automatic cars, were they just for tone?
Hi Jim, I probably used the wrong description, on the 68 automatic trans exhaust the tail pipe split into two branches. One was left open like a normal exhaust and the other was crimped shut. I was wondering if the second crimped shut tail pipe had another function other than effecting the sound of the exhaust? it should be visible in the attached picture.Not sure I have seen the tailpipes you speak of. My brother's '68 Bonneville had factory resonators which was part of the tail pipe assembly. These are essentially a small muffler that reduced the exhaust sound over what the mufflers did. I don't know how it was decided which cars got them and which ones didn't. My brother got rid of them when he put new tail pipes on without the resonators.
Here is what Chevy offered, a chambered pipe that stood in for a muffler. Basically a straight pipe with the crimped sections to dampen the sound waves. Here is a business that offers them and you can read a little about them. I don't know how they
View attachment 139643
Hi Jim, I probably used the wrong description, on the 68 automatic trans exhaust the tail pipe split into two branches. One was left open like a normal exhaust and the other was crimped shut. I was wondering if the second crimped shut tail pipe had another function other than effecting the sound of the exhaust? it should be visible in the attached picture.
Thanks,
Dean
I called Gardner exhaust and he explained to me that all 1968 GTO automatic Transmission cars had this exhaust system. If you look carefully at the picture you will see that there are 2 tailpipes joined together on each side, the top being the crimped and the bottom being open and exiting under the bumper. The chrome horn attaches to the bottom open pipe. He believes that the top closed pipe was for acoustic effects. the top crimped pipe would not be visible under the car. Probably useless trivia, but I leaned something today.Hmmm. I think what I see are 2 different rear tail pipe section choices. I see a tailpipe with the "crimped" end which looks like a deflector, not crimped off as in closed. Then I see the other tail pipe section below it and it uses the chrome '68 exhaust tips.
So I think what you are looking at are 2 options offered by the exhaust maker, 1 being the deflector - which directs exhaust down at the ground to save your bumper from deteriorating due to the chemicals in the exhaust fumes, and the other being factory below the bumper.
Couple of deflectors below. The Packard tip shows how the end is closed off to deflect the exhaust gases down to the ground.
View attachment 139669 View attachment 139670
Wow, thanks for going to that length to clarify. I would have never imagined that the pipes were split like that. I have never heard, not seen, anything like it. I knew about the resonators on the rear tail pipes.I called Gardner exhaust and he explained to me that all 1968 GTO automatic Transmission cars had this exhaust system. If you look carefully at the picture you will see that there are 2 tailpipes joined together on each side, the top being the crimped and the bottom being open and exiting under the bumper. The chrome horn attaches to the bottom open pipe. He believes that the top closed pipe was for acoustic effects. the top crimped pipe would not be visible under the car. Probably useless trivia, but I leaned something today.
I have to say Mr. Gardner was very pleasant and answered all my questions.
to get that little piece of originality will set you back north of 400.00. I think I will go with a normal setup.Wow, thanks for going to that length to clarify. I would have never imagined that the pipes were split like that. I have never heard, not seen, anything like it. I knew about the resonators on the rear tail pipes.
The more you learn, the more you realize you knew less.![]()
to get that little piece of originality will set you back north of 400.00. I think I will go with a normal setup.
Had to check out the 1968 Shop Manual. Found the drawing of it in the exhaust section. It is called a "tuner pipe." Who knew? LOLto get that little piece of originality will set you back north of 400.00. I think I will go with a normal setup.