Pontiac GTO Forum banner

LS Swap to Early GTO - MY OPINION

115K views 244 replies 89 participants last post by  11th Indian  
OK.....everybody on this forum knows I like to foist my opinion.....so here goes: Jim, I am 2 years your junior, and grew up during the same era. I remember these cars when they were new, and still have the Hot Rod magazine I bought in third grade that introduced the "HOT '70 models. My first ride in a performance Pontiac was terrifying, and it made an impression on me. On my second ride in a high performance Pontiac (66 GTO 4 speed), I ended up driving that car home as its new owner. Ask anybody our age or older, like Bear, what the seminal moment was, and we'll have a story. Bear's first GTO experience is located on line somewhere, and is a must read. Point is, these are OUR memories when WE came of age.....when there were no LS engines, computers, cell phones, etc. We are from a different era, and we want to feel that era when we drive our Pontiacs. I know I feel like a kid every time I get behind the wheel and bang gears. I get the same noise, smells, and brutal torque that only a Pontiac can deliver. That's my thing. My preference. I agree with 99.9 % of what you say. The thing is, there are a lot of sharp YOUNG guys in their 20's-40's who grew up in a different era. They have no first memories of a tripower wailing on a dark back road. They are buying affordable rollers, and customizing them to their interpretation. Some of them do fantastic work. Again, not my 'thing', but man, look at Crusty's ride. Pretty darn stunning. I too think a hot rod is primarily a pre war car warmed up a bit. Not a muscle car. A muscle car is a muscle car, going back to at least 1936, when Buick put the large Roadmaster engine into the light Special body and called it a Century. I like either original, or 'Day Two' musclecars, and I like the kind of hot rods I saw as a kid, and still see here in the central valley: tuck and roll naugahide interiors, period steering wheels, nailhead Buick, Olds, or Flathead power, and NO BILLET or BOYD anything. Old school stuff. Because I'm and old school guy. I get it. To me, putting an LS in a Pontiac is like putting a Kawasaki Z1 engine in a '47 Harley. The whole context of the machine is changed. Entirely. Some folks like that, though. They like the performance. I am more of a romantic, and prefer the rumble, the nostalgia, and the feeling that only a Pontiac engine can provide.
 
"...Not once did I feel the need to drop the flavor of the time modern engine between the fenders....
This is it, and stated brilliantly. Ever look at a Pro-stock style street car built in 1985 or so? No, they didn't age well. A lot of the 'flavor of the day' stuff doesn't hold up well over time. What holds up? Stock original and classy, tasteful customs. But "what's hip today might become passe". The original design of a true classic only gets better with age, like fine wine. Thanks 666bbbl....that's the heart of it, right there.
 
I think the key word was 'reliability', not drivability. Fuel injection, particularly port fuel injection with a dry manifold is superior to carburetion at pretty much every level. The main reason I take my '94 4Runner to the mountains instead of my '83 4x4 Toyota pickup is because of the fuel injection: the 'runner runs the same at sea level as it does at 10,000 feet. Not so the carbureted truck. That said, the reliability of a carburetor will surprise you young guys. I have been driving the original, born-with quadrajet on my '67 for 31 years now. And that's just me. The PO put 125k miles on it from '67 to '83. The same carb. The same distributor. 246,000 miles and counting. Started right up today when I went on errands, hadn't been started in two weeks. I actually thought about how well it runs because this same topic is now raging on the other forum in the 'fuel mileage' thread. Fuel injection IS better than carburetion, but in the musclecar world, you are not really giving up performance or reliability with a carb, driven normally. Crusty, your '65 is one of the nicest cars on this forum. I would be proud to own it and drive it. You did a hell of a job. That said, let's see if your still driving it 31 years from now on the same engine and induction system, with the same parts, as I have done. I wonder why younger people assume that this old school stuff isn't reliable? Lack of understanding on how it works? Lack of real world experience? I dunno. Hell, my 99 year old, bone stock Ford model T is reliable....and it's running it's original block and Holly G brass updraft carb.... Just have to drive it within its design limitations (SLOWLY!) ;)
 
Well said, Jim, as usual. I've been working on all of this stuff almost as long as you have, and for a living. Bottom line over the long haul: the older, lower tech mechanical stuff (Carbs and ignition points distributors) are slightly higher maintenance, but are superior in reliability over the higher tech electronic stuff over time. I have seen MANY tow-in's related to bad ignition modules, PCM, in-tank fuel pump, pick up coils, you name it. These vehicles required expensive parts and expensive diagnosis, many times, with dedicated specialized electronic tools. The tow ins I have seen with the older low tech cars could be diagnosed and repaired in short order with a test light and a screwdriver. Again, we will see how many 2014 Camaros will be on the road in 50 years......I'm betting not too many. Electronics degrade over time and use, rendering modern cars nothing more than expensive appliances: use them up and throw them away.
 
Well put, Crusty. One thing for sure here: you DO NOT need to make any apologies/excuses for your car. It's a work of art. Also, on your last sentence, the uninclined could be paying $$$ per hour to a 25 year old tech who's never SEEN a carburetor!! I appreciate both sides of the coin, but agree with Jim that when it comes to reliability, the 'old stuff' is just as reliable as the new stuff, and simpler to repair with low tech tools if you have the know how. Jim and I are dinosaurs, and are becoming extinct. I work on the new tech stuff, and am amazed at how bulletproof it is. And easy to diagnose/dial in. It's just an entirely different feel, that's all. I happen to be one of those rare buzzards that can butt and ear tune an engine to the nth degree with nothing more than a timing wrench and a screwdriver.It's truly a 'feel'...a fouled plug feels different than an open wire. A lean miss feels different than a dead miss, etc. Working/operating the old stuff is a whole different world. Some of us like it, some of us don't.
 
Crusty needs to make 666bbl a carbon fiber "A$$ Grass or Gas, Nobody Rides for Free" license plate frame for 'Linda'. BTW, I like Linda's shoes: period correct Americans. I would'nt change a thing. Like the color too. I might remove some of the cardboard and 'stuff' from the back seat area, but might not..........
 
It is indeed cool to say '421' or '428', but these big journal blocks are inferior to the 400 blocks due to thier heavy crankshaft and large swept bearing areas. They don't hold up nearly as well above 3000 rpm. I used to want a 421, but now, not so much. I'd probably stroke my 389 and still call it a 389....(it's actually a 394 now).
 
Hooray for Pontiac Jim!!! (Two thumbs up) My hat is off to you and I salute you, Sir. Yes, lots of ways to 'civilize' and 'modernize' an old brute, if one is so inclined. I'm not one of those guys, though.....I like it raw and visceral. I like to work for my exitement. Sweeter reward in the end. Very well said, indeed. If I wanted an LS I'd buy a modern car that came with it......but I don't want one. I shave with a mug and brush and drink my bourbon straight, too. No umbrellas in my cocktails......
 
Correct, pcguy. Asking which way to go is subjective. Some guys like antiques and some like the latest electronic gizmo. Just the way it is. Me, I'm just thankful that I don't give a hoot what I could sell my GTO's for, or what they'd bring. It's not why I bought them in the first place. I bought them over 30 years ago because I always loved them. Since my first car (a '66 GTO) I've always owned and driven GTO's. The most money I ever paid for one was 2k back in 1992 for a 4 speed '65, which I sold for $2700 the next year. For some of us, it was never about the money. It's all about driving a special old car. The way I figure it, having a sum total of about 8-10k into both my GTO's (not each, but both cars), it's a win-win even if they aren't resto-modded. Buy car for $1200 -$1800. Drive car for 30+ years, regularly, and repair as needed. Have same cars, use in the same manner, 30+ years later. Only now, the cars are worth roughly 20 times the purchase price. Not a bad deal at all, even for a non-resto moded car.
 
I know a guy or two that put Pinto motors in their Model A Fords. Popular 'upgrade' in the '70's. Nobody wants them now. An LS engine is a cheap, disposable power module meant for cheap, disposable cars. All new cars are appliances. I know. I work on them all the time. They are great cars. They go 300,000 miles. But then you throw them away. Like television sets. Nobody overhauls them anymore. Cheaper to buy another. In 30 years, nobody will want an outdated, stone-age-non-repairable-electronics LS powered car. They WILL want a Pontiac powered car that you can still jump the battery, pour some gas down the carb, and start it up. Class always ages well. The Trend of the Moment rarely does. Look at the Pet Rock. Beanie Babies. Pogs. Pro Stock....ho hum.....
 
I read an article in a hot rod magazine 20-30 years back, and a guy had taken his original '64 tripower GTO and turned it into an El Camino. His GTO had been hit in the rear so hard that the body and frame were unsalvageable. So, he found a '64 El Camino, and installed the GTO front clip, 389 tripower, 4 speed, diff, and even the '64 dash, wood wheel, and bucket seats. It was super clean, and looked factory. Was it a GTO in the end? I don't know, but I'd love to have it. The heart and soul of the GTO was intact and running, just the rear sheet metal was different. And yes, this thread could go on forever.
 
Yes, you 'get it', or you don't. Obviously, a Hyabusa engine would be a huge improvement over a primitive Indian Cheif or Vincent Black Shadow powerplant, but would the Indian or the Vincent really feel, and BE the same? Or would their soul be lost entirely. I prefer the visceral experience of a period powerplant. Just like I prefer a steam engine to a diesel. A whole lot more soul, primitive as it may be.
 
Got a Throw Away Engine
From a Throw Away Car
Gonna bolt it in my Geeto
Gonna shoot for the stars

It's the Flavor Of The Moment
The Order Of The Day
It's what everybody's doing
Which makes it all okay

Got a rockin' little small block
In my engine bay
With all the personality
Of a lump of clay

But she runs real smooth
And sounds real sweet
At least until next year
When she'll be OBSOLETE!
 
Here we go!!! :) I remember a guy I went to school with back in the day....He had a '67-'68 Firebird with a 4 speed and a Chevy 396. I used to clean his clock with my worn out '67 GTO ragtop (the one I still have). The last time I ran him was on the highway, and my engine had over 175,000 miles on it and a burnt exhaust valve. Beat the hell out of him up a long grade. I mean, like 20 car-lengths after about a mile. Another friend had a minty '66 ss396 Chevelle with the 325 HP engine and the 2 speed auto. Really clean and bone stock. My bone stock '65 GTO with the 335HP engine and the 2 speed auto I had at the time would consistently smoke him. Badly. He had a 3.31 rear gear and I had a 3.23. Both were open rears. Another friend had a really nice '69 SS396 Chevelle with a ton of engine work. Had a lot of $$$ in the engine. We used to hand him his tail regularly with my buddie's bone stock '67 GTO with a 2.93 rear and an automatic, with AC. Absolutely tear him up. The goat even had whitewalls and hubcaps. In fact, thinking back, among a group of about 6 of us with GTO's, NONE of use lost to a Chevy, even once. The closest was a '69 Z-28 with 2 4's on a cross ram with a 4 speed and a 4.11 gear: I beat him from a stop by about 2 car lengths at the end of about 1/3 mile.....he had a built 302 and I had a junkyard $150 '67 Catalina 2bbl engine with tripower added on my '66 GTO with a 4 speed and 3.55 gears. He hated me after that!! I guess the Chevrolets run harder on the East Coast? (as a disclaimer, I realize that big power can be had from the bowtie family, particularly when people 'in -the-know' do the work, but at that time, we simply never ran into one. Even an LS6 '70 Chevelle I ran lost to my tripower 400 4 speed '66 GTO. How it lost, I don't know, but it did indeed!)
 
Jim, you're more than welcome! I go to the Famoso March Meet and Famoso Hot Rod Reunion every year....in fact, a buddy called up yesterday to make sure we were scheduled to go this coming March! I have plenty of room and a highway-friendly GTO...any time you're ready! (I dropped out of State College after a year to get a 'temporary' job in the automotive industry to 'make some money'....ended up getting stuck there, too!! (was leaning on becoming a dentist of all things.....that would have been a financial disaster for sure!) Oh well!!!!